<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Inventor 2012 large assembly in Inventor Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/inventor-2012-large-assembly/m-p/6798569#M295646</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Point clouds are a bit different.&amp;nbsp; Most of the dedicated programs for those *are* multi-threaded, and so benefit from multiple CPUs.&amp;nbsp; But if all you are doing is consuming rather than processing them then you won't see as much of a benefit.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As far as your current hardware goes I don't think you'll get much additional benefit for money spent, point cloud or no.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 15:51:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dgorsman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-01-11T15:51:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Inventor 2012 large assembly</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/inventor-2012-large-assembly/m-p/6786007#M295641</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Were to start....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; I'm using Inventor to design large&amp;nbsp;equipment, piping and&amp;nbsp;structures for large plants. I have to break my assemblies down into 2k-6k part assemblies to make them "manageable". I receive some equipment and structures&amp;nbsp;from vendors and they are almost always surface parts and assemblies. I have to shrinkwrap these assemblies so the customer can't&amp;nbsp;modify anything and then they&amp;nbsp;import them into Revit.&amp;nbsp;I know Inventor isn't the best tool for something like this but corporate doesn't want to spend the money to get new software so that's off the table. They have however given me the ability to get a more powerful desktop.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/inventor-products/learn-explore/caas/CloudHelp/cloudhelp/2016/ENU/Inventor-Help/files/GUID-46E714D8-8D90-4D1D-BD6D-8B30ABF78E50-htm.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/inventor-products/learn-explore/caas/CloudHelp/cloudhelp/2016/ENU/Inventor-Help/files/GUID-46E714D8-8D90-4D1D-BD6D-8B30ABF78E50-htm.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I try to refine my assemblies per the above link....doesn't help that much.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The last thing I want to do is get a new computer and it not improve anything.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My current desktop&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 @ 3.70GHz&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AMD FirePro W7000 Graphics card&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;32GB RAM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My current Laptop&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i7 2.7GHz&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NVIDIA Quadro K2100M&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;16GB RAM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So what I was planning to do is give&amp;nbsp;our IT department&amp;nbsp;this link and tell them to follow its recommendations for a computer,&amp;nbsp;Dual processors&amp;nbsp;i7 4.0GHZ and everything else as&amp;nbsp;top of the line as I can get. One of my main goals is to speed up the shrinkwrap process as much as I can, Right now it takes me a few days to get one assembly shrinkwrapped. And I'd like&amp;nbsp;to be able to bring these assemblies back together, I need to be able to design piping and the building with everything in its home. I know their are a bunch of variables to this but&amp;nbsp;Would a computer built per Autodesks link above give me the ability to do this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 20:35:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/inventor-2012-large-assembly/m-p/6786007#M295641</guid>
      <dc:creator>c.lutz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-05T20:35:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inventor 2012 large assembly</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/inventor-2012-large-assembly/m-p/6786327#M295642</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This part:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Dual Six core processor (12 cores total, hyperthreading not recommended because Inventor does not take advantage (except Studio rendering)).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;... isn't as clear as it should be.&amp;nbsp; Its not that Inventor doesn't take advantage of hyperthreading, it doesn't do a whole lot with multi-threading (things that can be spread across many CPU cores).&amp;nbsp; A dual CPU won't benefit you.&amp;nbsp; You may well be close to top-of-the-line already.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 22:32:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/inventor-2012-large-assembly/m-p/6786327#M295642</guid>
      <dc:creator>dgorsman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-05T22:32:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inventor 2012 large assembly</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/inventor-2012-large-assembly/m-p/6787438#M295643</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;would be more beneficial to upgrade to inventor 2017 or inventor 2018&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:30:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/inventor-2012-large-assembly/m-p/6787438#M295643</guid>
      <dc:creator>smokes2998</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-06T13:30:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inventor 2012 large assembly</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/inventor-2012-large-assembly/m-p/6787789#M295644</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Inventor 2018 is not out yet and even when it is released you probably want to wait for the first Service Pack before installing it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Inventor 2017 R3 (release number 3) would be a better choice.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 15:29:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/inventor-2012-large-assembly/m-p/6787789#M295644</guid>
      <dc:creator>ShayaGhanbar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-06T15:29:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inventor 2012 large assembly</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/inventor-2012-large-assembly/m-p/6798224#M295645</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are looking to get a laser scanner also&amp;nbsp;so I am trying to get us into at least 2016 so we can import the point cloud in Inventor. So as far as hardware, it looks like a larger faster computer wont help?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 14:05:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/inventor-2012-large-assembly/m-p/6798224#M295645</guid>
      <dc:creator>c.lutz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-11T14:05:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inventor 2012 large assembly</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/inventor-2012-large-assembly/m-p/6798569#M295646</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Point clouds are a bit different.&amp;nbsp; Most of the dedicated programs for those *are* multi-threaded, and so benefit from multiple CPUs.&amp;nbsp; But if all you are doing is consuming rather than processing them then you won't see as much of a benefit.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As far as your current hardware goes I don't think you'll get much additional benefit for money spent, point cloud or no.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 15:51:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/inventor-2012-large-assembly/m-p/6798569#M295646</guid>
      <dc:creator>dgorsman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-11T15:51:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

