topic Re: Flush constraint fail in Inventor Forum

Flush constraint fail

phaeronkor — Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:07:26 GMT

Hello.

Can somebody help me to figure out what is worng with constraint or my asembly?

1. Flush constraint added to assy.

2. Checking distance. And we see that Z axis shows some distance. And how that can be?

I know that number is very small, but it really pisses me off...

Thanks!

Re: Flush constraint fail

CCarreiras — Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:26:51 GMT

Hi!

I don't have the same behavior as you.

In my case flush gives-me the z=0

Check if you have this option on and disable it:

Check if your flush as an offset in it.

Re: Flush constraint fail

phaeronkor — Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:30:56 GMT

Hello, thanks for answer!

Try higher precision: 8,12345678. With your precision I have 0 mm too.

Option is turned off.

Re: Flush constraint fail

CCarreiras — Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:55:02 GMT

Hi!

Again.... z=0

Re: Flush constraint fail

WHolzwarth — Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:57:36 GMT

IMO the issue is born in the original assembly, not the STEP.

Two ways for fixing:

- Pattern the fixed sub-assy

- Right-click on misaligned sub-assy-> iProperties -> Occurence -> Set z to 0.

Re: Flush constraint fail

CCarreiras — Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:59:43 GMT

Which version are you using?

Have you all service packs installed?

By the way ... why are you using all that precision?!!

In real world.... for these kind of assemblies, why do you need such thing.

Re: Flush constraint fail

phaeronkor — Thu, 19 Jan 2017 13:01:14 GMT

But I have the same offset in STEP model, not only in assy.

Re: Flush constraint fail

phaeronkor — Thu, 19 Jan 2017 13:03:28 GMT

The last one, R3 update 2017 Inventor Pro.

Of course I don't need such precision, I said about that in my last sentence of a very first post. I just randomly clicked on that precision and saw this, and it's pissed me off)

Re: Flush constraint fail

phaeronkor — Thu, 19 Jan 2017 13:08:08 GMT

Hah, btw you're right! In the occurence tab there was that offset...really strange, cause every cyclone filter was get from one master multibody model and all lefthanded (don't know why while exporting it to step model every cyclone becomes righthanded) types were misaligned with offset of that number.

Thanks a lot! My nerves are safe!