<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Lifting Analysis FEA in Inventor Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/lifting-analysis-fea/m-p/10014193#M121137</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I recently bought a book from Wasim Younis (Up and Running with Autodesk Inventor FEA ) and I am now studing the DP-16 Chapter 18 which is the lifting analysis for an offshore container.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I had a few questions regarding this analysis maybe I can get better clarifications from some members experts in simulation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.- When he applies the load for 4 points of lifting, he applies the total distributed load of F=2.5xtotal mass x 9.8 (as per code), which includes the tare mass (body mass) but at the same time the gravity is taken into account.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wouldn't this action be doubling the body load/mass if I consider gravity and plus I apply a distributed load (F) to the floor, which includes the tare mass?.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.-The custom constraints applied to the 4 corners of the container to avoid larger displacements are not very clear for me (uplift none) does this mean no separation using a spring? or why this is allowable for this particular case anyways?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/108623"&gt;@JDMather&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Sir, did you have the opportunity to take a look into this excersice and explain a bit more this analysis?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am attaching the model for better understanding.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you all for your help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 21:16:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-01-19T21:16:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Lifting Analysis FEA</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/lifting-analysis-fea/m-p/10014193#M121137</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I recently bought a book from Wasim Younis (Up and Running with Autodesk Inventor FEA ) and I am now studing the DP-16 Chapter 18 which is the lifting analysis for an offshore container.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I had a few questions regarding this analysis maybe I can get better clarifications from some members experts in simulation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.- When he applies the load for 4 points of lifting, he applies the total distributed load of F=2.5xtotal mass x 9.8 (as per code), which includes the tare mass (body mass) but at the same time the gravity is taken into account.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wouldn't this action be doubling the body load/mass if I consider gravity and plus I apply a distributed load (F) to the floor, which includes the tare mass?.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.-The custom constraints applied to the 4 corners of the container to avoid larger displacements are not very clear for me (uplift none) does this mean no separation using a spring? or why this is allowable for this particular case anyways?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/108623"&gt;@JDMather&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Sir, did you have the opportunity to take a look into this excersice and explain a bit more this analysis?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am attaching the model for better understanding.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you all for your help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 21:16:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/lifting-analysis-fea/m-p/10014193#M121137</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-19T21:16:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lifting Analysis FEA</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/lifting-analysis-fea/m-p/10144419#M121138</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1- Gravity load is for the structure of the container&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;65 tons is the total load (only the material, the content in the container, that is not modeled, not the structure)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2- Solver can't work if the system is not stable and stabilized&amp;nbsp; (math)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So you can constraint the system and leave free only one direction of freedom (the other are constrained with a virtual spring with a certain stiffness). It's just a a smart common way to get close to reality in some case.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:03:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/lifting-analysis-fea/m-p/10144419#M121138</guid>
      <dc:creator>admaiora</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-10T08:03:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

