<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Design Roads and Proposals in InfraWorks Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/infraworks-forum/design-roads-and-proposals/m-p/5572245#M23387</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Same comment here too, we need these to be individual Ideas:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It would be best if a list like this were sumbitted as individual ideas. &amp;nbsp;Having a singular, "bite-sized" approach makes these things much more doable from a development standpoint and eaiser to discuss and support from a community support standpoint. &amp;nbsp;As it is now, the development team has to consider all of these items at once and that makes fulfillment of this idea very challenging. Also, multiple ideas dillute and complicate the voting and discussion process.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I suggest that you re-post this as individual ideas - you'll have much better chance of getting support and acceptance from the user community and from Autodesk.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 15:32:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Eric_Chappell</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-04-06T15:32:47Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

