<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Traffic simulation for design? in InfraWorks Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/infraworks-forum/traffic-simulation-for-design/m-p/5811861#M22128</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Someone asked me&amp;nbsp;what questions&amp;nbsp;Autodesk is trying to&amp;nbsp;answer with&amp;nbsp;the traffic simulation tools.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From what I have seen, they are not intended to do a final sell of anything, but to give engineers ideas and general guidance when proposing things early on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, they are a way to make little cars drive around and look cool, which is something competing products do that clients like.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't want to sell the IW team short though. Are the tools intended to prove to an agency or client that a certain option should be done, and will fulfill the need at hand?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anyone say "we used to do this process, and now we do this in IW instead"?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm tired of the Autodesk type answers "you use it however it helps you, we do not limit it to any use..." like I didn't know that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 20:54:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JamesMaeding</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-09-10T20:54:59Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

