<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: feed height vs retract height question in HSM Support Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-support-forum/feed-height-vs-retract-height-question/m-p/6655449#M13058</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;great ill give it a shot&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2016 20:55:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rickg5056</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-10-29T20:55:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>feed height vs retract height question</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-support-forum/feed-height-vs-retract-height-question/m-p/6654631#M13056</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;so....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;im using the drililng rapid out out cycle with a tapping head to tap holes...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the problem im having is&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i want to set the retract height high enough to ensure that when it pulls out of the hole it goes high enough to make sure that the tap has&amp;nbsp; cleared the hole before it continues to the next hole...thus ensuring the tap isnt still coming out of the hole when it moves to the next and breaks the tap..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the problem so far is that its ripping the top couple of threads out of the hole when it retracts ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have the feed height set to 5mm above the hole..and retractc height set to 12mm above the hole..so whats happening i think is that its retracting at the feedrate i have set up to the feed height...then its using the rapid feedrate up to the 12mm retract height... thats whats causing the thread tearing of the top couple of threads,,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so... is there a way i can make it use the retract feedrate all the way up to the retract height instead of just up to the feed height..... this would solve the problem..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;any insight appreciated..&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2016 00:46:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-support-forum/feed-height-vs-retract-height-question/m-p/6654631#M13056</guid>
      <dc:creator>rickg5056</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-29T00:46:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: feed height vs retract height question</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-support-forum/feed-height-vs-retract-height-question/m-p/6654780#M13057</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You would have to raise the feed height more to get more feed movement indeed.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can make the retract and feedheight the same so it doesn't have to go higher than with a rapid than it has gone with the feed height.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2016 06:13:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-support-forum/feed-height-vs-retract-height-question/m-p/6654780#M13057</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laurens-3DTechDraw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-29T06:13:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: feed height vs retract height question</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-support-forum/feed-height-vs-retract-height-question/m-p/6655449#M13058</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;great ill give it a shot&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2016 20:55:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-support-forum/feed-height-vs-retract-height-question/m-p/6655449#M13058</guid>
      <dc:creator>rickg5056</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-29T20:55:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: feed height vs retract height question</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-support-forum/feed-height-vs-retract-height-question/m-p/6655596#M13059</link>
      <description>Wouldn't the Boring cycle be a much better cycle to use? You can set the retract feed faster than the plunge feed.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2016 01:02:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-support-forum/feed-height-vs-retract-height-question/m-p/6655596#M13059</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steinwerks</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-30T01:02:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: feed height vs retract height question</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-support-forum/feed-height-vs-retract-height-question/m-p/6655759#M13060</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2208016"&gt;@Steinwerks&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Wouldn't the Boring cycle be a much better cycle to use? You can set the retract feed faster than the plunge feed.&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Actaully he would need a slower retract feed to be sure the tap is out of the hole.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2016 09:14:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-support-forum/feed-height-vs-retract-height-question/m-p/6655759#M13060</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laurens-3DTechDraw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-30T09:14:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: feed height vs retract height question</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-support-forum/feed-height-vs-retract-height-question/m-p/6655809#M13061</link>
      <description>Tapmatic told me to run the retract feed at 1.05* tapping feedrate but I suppose it will depend on the head used. Presumably the OP is using a self-reversing head of course.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2016 11:36:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-support-forum/feed-height-vs-retract-height-question/m-p/6655809#M13061</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steinwerks</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-30T11:36:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: feed height vs retract height question</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-support-forum/feed-height-vs-retract-height-question/m-p/6655893#M13062</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2208016"&gt;@Steinwerks&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Tapmatic told me to run the retract feed at 1.05* tapping feedrate but I suppose it will depend on the head used. Presumably the OP is using a self-reversing head of course.&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yeah and for that reason I would say you want more rotations for it coming out of the hole. But yeah totally depends on the tapping head and the machine cycle.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But indeed a lot of different cycles to use.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2016 13:56:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-support-forum/feed-height-vs-retract-height-question/m-p/6655893#M13062</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laurens-3DTechDraw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-30T13:56:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: feed height vs retract height question</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-support-forum/feed-height-vs-retract-height-question/m-p/6656108#M13063</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;the boring cycle would accomplish the same thing...yes...because it gives you separate control over the plunge and retract feedrates&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have the tapmatic 30x...the reverse rpm on it is 1.75 times the tapping rpm..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it has .140 of self feed...and the directions say to make the feed height plus the units self feed equal to the total tapping feed depth&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;im tapping at 500 rpm x the pitch .8 is 400mm/minute plunge rate and so the retract rpm is 875 and the retract rate 700mm/minute retract rate&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;its a 12mm hole so i set the bottom height in the heights tab .140in higher to account for the .140in of the units self feed (i think i did this all right)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the kicker is that i did a 20hole test before all this trouble..and it went flawlessly.. but i did not pay attention to the height settings...and i wa tapping at 700rpm i think..im not sure...im pretty frustrated,.,.had to take a break..LOL..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2016 18:38:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-support-forum/feed-height-vs-retract-height-question/m-p/6656108#M13063</guid>
      <dc:creator>rickg5056</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-30T18:38:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

