topic Re: Enhancements to the post processor property definitions in HSM Post Processor Forum

Enhancements to the post processor property definitions

AchimN — Thu, 24 Aug 2017 11:32:10 GMT

With the R3 release of HSM (which is coming soon) we have added new functionalities to the post processor property definitions.

The following properties are supported for the definition (might change until it will be finally released):

Property	Property Types	Value Type	Description	Default
id (for the object itself)	All	String	The identifier for the matching user defined property.	None.
title	All	String	The short title that will be presented in the user interface.	Defaults to the property identifier.
description	All	String	A full description of the property to be presented along with the property.	None.
group	All	Integer	Identifier that can be used to group properties together in the user interface.	Defaults to a unique integer.
type	All	String	Specifies the type of the property. "enum", "spatial", "angle", "number", "integer", "boolean", "file", "folder". A definition requires a type to be accepted.	None. This is required.
values	ENUM, INTEGER	Array	Specifies the accepted values. Items of array may be the value itself or a map with the value and a corresponding title. {id:VALUE, title:TITLE}. VALUE must be of the same type as the property. And TITLE must be a String. E.g. for an enum: 'values: [{id:"a", title:”A-axis”}, {id:"b”, title:”B-axis”}]'.	None.
presentation	BOOLEAN	String	Tells the user interface how to present the boolean type. Any of these strings are supported: “yesno”, “truefalse”, “onoff”, “10”.	Default to On/Off.
default_mm	All	Same as property	Tells the user interface the default value to use for inch mode.	Defaults to the property value.
default_in	All	Same as property	Tells the user interface the default value to use for inch mode.	Defaults to the property value.

Here are some examples:

user defined dropdown menu:

propertyDefinitions = {
  isnc:{title: "Use ISNC or BNC mode", description: "Selects between ISNC (ISO NC mode) and BNC (Basic NC mode).", type: "boolean", values: ["Basic NC mode", "ISO NC mode"]}
};

propertyDefinitions = {
  rotaryTableAxis: {
    title: "Rotary table axis",
    description: "Selects the rotary table axis orientation.",
    type: "enum",
    values:[
      {title:"No rotary", id:"none"},
      {title:"Along +X", id:"x"},
      {title:"Along +Y", id:"y"},
      {title:"Along +Z", id:"z"},
      {title:"Along -X", id:"-x"},
      {title:"Along -Y", id:"-y"},
      {title:"Along -Z", id:"-z"}
    ]
  }
};

file selection:

propertyDefinitions = {
  machineDefinition: {
    title: "Machine definition",
    description: "Specifies the file path of the machine definition to use.",
    type: "file"
  }
}

check for allowed ranges and specify unit specific defaults:

propertyDefinitions = {
  retractHeight: {title:"Retract height", description:"The retract height between operations.", type:"spatial", range:[0,10000], default_mm:5, default_in:0.2},
}

tooltips:

We will add these new features to the generic posts in the future more and more, for now these posts have sample code implemented already:

http://cam.autodesk.com/posts/?p=haas_umc-750

http://cam.autodesk.com/posts/?p=thermwood_5-axis

http://cam.autodesk.com/posts/?p=hurco

http://cam.autodesk.com/posts/?p=tormach

http://cam.autodesk.com/posts/?p=heidenhain

Re: New features for the post processor properties

Laurens-3DTechDraw — Thu, 24 Aug 2017 11:31:02 GMT

Awesome stuff!

Re: Enhancements to the post processor property definitions

parobillard — Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:01:00 GMT

That's a great addition!!! It could replace the need for "interactive post"

Re: Enhancements to the post processor property definitions

parobillard — Thu, 24 Aug 2017 13:46:21 GMT

@AchimN Do you know if there will be a possibility to pass interactive data from the cps to the hsm post window

Ex:

In my setupsheet post I use interactive to "ask question" to the programmer ( G54, G55 ect definition ) so my setupsheet post "send" data to my interactive HTA then the HTA send data back to the setupsheet post.

but the data sended to the HTA is relative to the program I'm posting

I'm not sure if you can understand what I mean as my english is limited...

Betreff: Enhancements to the post processor property definitions

denis_q — Wed, 30 Aug 2017 08:00:47 GMT

Great work. Can we get a property 'visible'? Think of properties from generic post that have

a fixed value and do not need to be displayed.

So far you have to change at least 2 lines of code.

How does the property 'group' work? Can't see anything changing.

Thanks

Re: Enhancements to the post processor property definitions

Anonymous — Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:26:02 GMT

Will this update be compatible with Fusion 360 right away? The custom drop-down menu properties are exactly what I've wanted for optimizing my post processor.

Thanks.

Betreff: Enhancements to the post processor property definitions

timdrink01 — Wed, 28 Feb 2018 17:49:53 GMT

@denis_q wrote:
Great work. Can we get a property 'visible'? Think of properties from generic post that have
a fixed value and do not need to be displayed.
So far you have to change at least 2 lines of code.
How does the property 'group' work? Can't see anything changing.

Thanks

I agree, a way to hide settings that you don't want the user to mess with would be great. I've also been playing with the grouping and can't seem to get anything to change.

Betreff: Enhancements to the post processor property definitions

timdrink01 — Wed, 28 Feb 2018 22:01:47 GMT

I added a property and it is showing up in a bold blue font. Why? Is that normal?

Betreff: Enhancements to the post processor property definitions

Anonymous — Wed, 28 Feb 2018 22:12:15 GMT

@timdrink01 wrote:
I added a property and it is showing up in a bold blue font. Why? Is that normal?

In my experience, that is normal for a property that has been changed from the default value specified in the PP.

Kyle

Re: Enhancements to the post processor property definitions

djowen40 — Mon, 02 Apr 2018 20:12:14 GMT

Has anyone managed to get the "group" property to work? I have spent some time fiddling and it doesn't seem to make any difference to the presentation of the variables in the post window.

So far I have the code below and would expect to see myNewThing1 & 3 grouped together and myNewThing2 & 4 grouped together. However, it doesn't seem to matter what I do with the group properties the values are simply presented in alphabetical order (seemingly based on the variable name) in the fusion 360 post window.

properties = {  
  myNewThing1: false,
  myNewThing2: false,
  myNewThing3: false,
  myNewThing4: false,
};

// user-defined property definitions
propertyDefinitions = {  
  myNewThing1: {title:"My New Thing 1", description:"We are testing", type:"boolean", group: 1},
  myNewThing2: {title:"My New Thing 2", description:"We are testing", type:"boolean", group: 2},
  myNewThing3: {title:"My New Thing 3", description:"We are testing", type:"boolean", group: 1},
  myNewThing4: {title:"My New Thing 4", description:"We are testing", type:"boolean", group: 2}
};

Have I misinterpreted the intended outcome of the group property?

If anyone could shed some light on a way to use this grouping property and/or any other way of controlling the order in which the post window displays properties that would be helpful.