<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Siemens 810t L97 Cycle working but.. in HSM Post Processor Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/siemens-810t-l97-cycle-working-but/m-p/8911072#M13959</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That was strange,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tested with a newly installed fusion and i had to turn off and on threading cycle first before it worked.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;%MPF111
( program: %MPF111 )
( NaN )
( undefined )
( Generated at: 2019/7/16 7:16:43 on N55SF )
( Postprocessor: D:\Dokument\OwnCloud\CNC\Postprocessors\Fusion360\Siemens\EMCO_810T_2018-07-23.cps )
( Cam: Fusion 360 CAM 2.0.6037 )
N1 G90 G94 G18
N2 G71
N3 G92 S3500

( Drill2 )
N4 T5 D5
N5 G54
N6 G58 Z60
N7 G94
N8 G97 S810 M3
N9 G0 X0 Z4
N10 F49
N11 R11=0 R22=8.995 R24=1.5 R25=1.5 R26=-22.445 R27=0 R28=0
N12 L98 P1
N13 G0 X0 Z8.995
N14 G0 Z4

( Thread1 )
N15 M1
N16 T6 D6
N17 G54
N18 G58 Z60
N19 M8
N20 G95
N21 G97 S500 M3
N22 G0 X14 Z25
N23 G0 Z3.751
N24 R20=1 R21=12.2 R22=-1.642 R23=1 R24=0.535 R25=0.05 R26=5 R27=1 R28=5 R29=29 R31=12.2 R32=-14.029
N25 L97 P1
N26 G0 Z25

N27 M9
N28 M30
%&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now i get this output!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Program name must start with&amp;nbsp;%MPF.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can turn off cycle comments, notes and postinformation with the program settings property window.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2019 05:27:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>robert_persson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-07-16T05:27:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Siemens 810t L97 Cycle working but..</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/siemens-810t-l97-cycle-working-but/m-p/8145686#M13952</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, Got the L97 Cycle working but need some help Tweaking it&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need some pointers how to get the finish and start point in Z.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the code im using now to get the start and finish point!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;var backFromFront = hasParameter("operation:applyStockOffsetBackFromFront") &amp;amp;&amp;amp; getParameter("operation:applyStockOffsetBackFromFront") === 1;&lt;BR /&gt;var pos = backFromFront ? currentSection.getFinalPosition() : currentSection.getInitialPosition();&lt;BR /&gt;var ThreadFinishPointZ = backFromFront ? pos.z : z;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ThreadStartPointZ = ThreadFinishPointZ + -cycle.incrementalZ;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Im not getting the precise start and stop values with this code im a few tenths of a millimetre off.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It shouldnt be any big problems converting the threading cycle to other Siemens machines when im done.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can someone please give me some pointers??&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2018 05:18:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/siemens-810t-l97-cycle-working-but/m-p/8145686#M13952</guid>
      <dc:creator>robert_persson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-21T05:18:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Siemens 810t L97 Cycle working but..</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/siemens-810t-l97-cycle-working-but/m-p/8146052#M13953</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Have figured out that it has to do with the pitch...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When i have the pitch set to 2mm then the z start and finish point is zero.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is how it looks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1001&lt;BR /&gt;N1 G90 G94 G18&lt;BR /&gt;N2 G71&lt;BR /&gt;N3 G92 S3500&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;( Thread2 )&lt;BR /&gt;N29 G95&lt;BR /&gt;N30 G97 S500 M4&lt;BR /&gt;N31 G0 X62 Z5&lt;BR /&gt;N32 G0 Z0&lt;BR /&gt;(R20 = 2 Pitch)&lt;BR /&gt;(R21 = 60 Start point of the thread in X)&lt;BR /&gt;(R22 = 0 Start point of the thread in Z)&lt;BR /&gt;(R23 = 0 Number of idle passes)&lt;BR /&gt;(R24 = -1.3 Thread depth (positive value = inside thread, negative value = outside thread))&lt;BR /&gt;(R25 = 0.05 Finishing increment)&lt;BR /&gt;(R26 = 0 Approach Path)&lt;BR /&gt;(R27 = 0 Run-Out Path)&lt;BR /&gt;(R28 = 5 Number of roughing cuts)&lt;BR /&gt;(R29 = 0 Infeed Angle)&lt;BR /&gt;(R31 = 60 End point of the thread in X (absolute))&lt;BR /&gt;(R32 = -20 End point of the thread in z (absolute))&lt;BR /&gt;N33 R20=2 R21=60 R22=0 R23=0 R24=-1.3 R25=0.05 R26=0 R27=0 R28=5 R29=0 R31=60 R32=-20&lt;BR /&gt;N34 L97 P1&lt;BR /&gt;N35 G0 Z5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;N64 M9&lt;BR /&gt;N65 M30&lt;BR /&gt;%&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the z start point with different pitch values.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(R20 = 0.5 Pitch)&lt;BR /&gt;(R22 = 0.344 Start point of the thread in Z)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(R20 = 1 Pitch)&lt;BR /&gt;(R22 = 0.229 Start point of the thread in Z)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(R20 = 1.5 Pitch)&lt;BR /&gt;(R22 = 0.115 Start point of the thread in Z)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(R20 = 2 Pitch)&lt;BR /&gt;(R22 = 0 Start point of the thread in Z)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(R20 = 2.5 Pitch)&lt;BR /&gt;(R22 = -0.115 Start point of the thread in Z)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(R20 = 3 Pitch)&lt;BR /&gt;(R22 = -0.229 Start point of the thread in Z)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(R20 = 3.5 Pitch)&lt;BR /&gt;(R22 = -0.344 Start point of the thread in Z)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(R20 = 4 Pitch)&lt;BR /&gt;(R22 = -0.458 Start point of the thread in Z)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The&amp;nbsp;difference seems&amp;nbsp;"linear" so it should be possible to correct with some calculations but how ? &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:41:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/siemens-810t-l97-cycle-working-but/m-p/8146052#M13953</guid>
      <dc:creator>robert_persson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-21T14:41:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Siemens 810t L97 Cycle working but..</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/siemens-810t-l97-cycle-working-but/m-p/8146615#M13954</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Its solved now with the help with some Math!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is how it looks now!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;( Thread0,5 )&lt;BR /&gt;N4 T2 D2&lt;BR /&gt;( OD Threading )&lt;BR /&gt;N5 G54&lt;BR /&gt;N6 G58 Z60&lt;BR /&gt;N7 M8&lt;BR /&gt;N8 G95&lt;BR /&gt;N9 G97 S500 M4&lt;BR /&gt;N10 G0 X62 Z5.344&lt;BR /&gt;N11 G0 Z1.932&lt;BR /&gt;(R20 = 0.5 Pitch)&lt;BR /&gt;(R21 = 60 Start point of the thread in X)&lt;BR /&gt;(R22 = 0 Start point of the thread in Z)&lt;BR /&gt;(R23 = 0 Number of idle passes)&lt;BR /&gt;(R24 = -1.3 Thread depth (positive value = inside thread, negative value = outside thread))&lt;BR /&gt;(R25 = 0.05 Finishing increment)&lt;BR /&gt;(R26 = 1 Approach Path)&lt;BR /&gt;(R27 = 2 Run-Out Path)&lt;BR /&gt;(R28 = 5 Number of roughing cuts)&lt;BR /&gt;(R29 = 29.5 Infeed Angle)&lt;BR /&gt;(R31 = 60 End point of the thread in X (absolute))&lt;BR /&gt;(R32 = -20 End point of the thread in z (absolute))&lt;BR /&gt;N12 R20=0.5 R21=60 R22=0 R23=0 R24=-1.3 R25=0.05 R26=1 R27=2 R28=5 R29=29.5 R31=60 R32=-20&lt;BR /&gt;N13 L97 P1&lt;BR /&gt;N14 G0 Z5.344&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;N15 M9&lt;BR /&gt;N16 M30&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2018 09:30:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/siemens-810t-l97-cycle-working-but/m-p/8146615#M13954</guid>
      <dc:creator>robert_persson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-22T09:30:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Siemens 810t L97 Cycle working but..</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/siemens-810t-l97-cycle-working-but/m-p/8908782#M13955</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3736769"&gt;@robert_persson&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; would you mind posting a copy of your post processor?&amp;nbsp; I am working on a EMCO 320 lathe with an 810T control and having some issues.&amp;nbsp; for one, the canned threading cycle is not working, but it looks like you might have found the solution.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is your post processor working with the drilling canned cycles?&amp;nbsp; Mine is not because it is not calling the right R values, and I'm not quite proficient&amp;nbsp;enough to tweak the post processor.&amp;nbsp; I'd love to see a copy of yours because&amp;nbsp;it sounds like you may have solved this?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2019 04:25:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/siemens-810t-l97-cycle-working-but/m-p/8908782#M13955</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-15T04:25:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Siemens 810t L97 Cycle working but..</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/siemens-810t-l97-cycle-working-but/m-p/8909867#M13956</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, you can try it out, i think the L98 cycle for deep hole drilling is working.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2019 15:47:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/siemens-810t-l97-cycle-working-but/m-p/8909867#M13956</guid>
      <dc:creator>robert_persson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-15T15:47:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Siemens 810t L97 Cycle working but..</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/siemens-810t-l97-cycle-working-but/m-p/8909962#M13957</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Great, thank you for the fast response!&amp;nbsp; I'll give this a shot and see what happens.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2019 16:19:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/siemens-810t-l97-cycle-working-but/m-p/8909962#M13957</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-15T16:19:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Siemens 810t L97 Cycle working but..</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/siemens-810t-l97-cycle-working-but/m-p/8910862#M13958</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3736769"&gt;@robert_persson&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; I think I must have misunderstood this thread. I thought that you had figured out a way that you could have Fusion 360 take the thread information and use the post processor to turn it into R values so that threading would happen as a canned L97 cycle.&amp;nbsp; But after examining the post processor, I don't think it acts that way.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I too can get the L97 threading to work by manually inserting the code with the proper R values, but have not figured out a way to make this work within Fusion 360.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let me know if I'm off base.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for sending me your post processor.&amp;nbsp; I'm still having an issue with drilling.&amp;nbsp; Your post calls up drilling as "CYCLE81" where as mine is looking for a canned cycle.&amp;nbsp; But I might be able to hack my post together to make it work.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2019 00:50:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/siemens-810t-l97-cycle-working-but/m-p/8910862#M13958</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-16T00:50:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Siemens 810t L97 Cycle working but..</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/siemens-810t-l97-cycle-working-but/m-p/8911072#M13959</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That was strange,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tested with a newly installed fusion and i had to turn off and on threading cycle first before it worked.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;%MPF111
( program: %MPF111 )
( NaN )
( undefined )
( Generated at: 2019/7/16 7:16:43 on N55SF )
( Postprocessor: D:\Dokument\OwnCloud\CNC\Postprocessors\Fusion360\Siemens\EMCO_810T_2018-07-23.cps )
( Cam: Fusion 360 CAM 2.0.6037 )
N1 G90 G94 G18
N2 G71
N3 G92 S3500

( Drill2 )
N4 T5 D5
N5 G54
N6 G58 Z60
N7 G94
N8 G97 S810 M3
N9 G0 X0 Z4
N10 F49
N11 R11=0 R22=8.995 R24=1.5 R25=1.5 R26=-22.445 R27=0 R28=0
N12 L98 P1
N13 G0 X0 Z8.995
N14 G0 Z4

( Thread1 )
N15 M1
N16 T6 D6
N17 G54
N18 G58 Z60
N19 M8
N20 G95
N21 G97 S500 M3
N22 G0 X14 Z25
N23 G0 Z3.751
N24 R20=1 R21=12.2 R22=-1.642 R23=1 R24=0.535 R25=0.05 R26=5 R27=1 R28=5 R29=29 R31=12.2 R32=-14.029
N25 L97 P1
N26 G0 Z25

N27 M9
N28 M30
%&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now i get this output!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Program name must start with&amp;nbsp;%MPF.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can turn off cycle comments, notes and postinformation with the program settings property window.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2019 05:27:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/siemens-810t-l97-cycle-working-but/m-p/8911072#M13959</guid>
      <dc:creator>robert_persson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-16T05:27:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Siemens 810t L97 Cycle working but..</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/siemens-810t-l97-cycle-working-but/m-p/8912688#M13960</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I tried this a couple times with no luck... and then, MAGIC!!!!&amp;nbsp; The clouds parted, a choir started singing, and Fusion 360 posted this beautiful code:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;%MPF12&lt;BR /&gt;( program: %MPF12 )&lt;BR /&gt;( undefined )&lt;BR /&gt;( Generated at: 2019/7/16 12:04:17 on WOPR-10 )&lt;BR /&gt;( Postprocessor: c:\users\curt\appdata\roaming\autodesk\fusion 360 cam\posts\EMCO_810T_2018-07-23.cps )&lt;BR /&gt;( Document: test piece drilling and od threading v1 )&lt;BR /&gt;( Cam: Fusion 360 CAM 2.0.6037 )&lt;BR /&gt;( Machine )&lt;BR /&gt;( vendor: EMCO )&lt;BR /&gt;( model: 320 )&lt;BR /&gt;( description: EMMA Evaluation Lathe 2019 )&lt;BR /&gt;N10 G90 G94 G18&lt;BR /&gt;N11 G70&lt;BR /&gt;N12 G92 S4000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;( Drill1 )&lt;BR /&gt;N13 T7 D7&lt;BR /&gt;N14 G54&lt;BR /&gt;N15 G58 Z60&lt;BR /&gt;N16 M8&lt;BR /&gt;N17 G94&lt;BR /&gt;N18 G97 S410 M4&lt;BR /&gt;N19 G0 X0 Z0.75&lt;BR /&gt;N20 F2&lt;BR /&gt;(L98 Deep hole drilling cycle with chip removal Full retract)&lt;BR /&gt;(R11 = 1 (0=With chip breaking, 1=With chip removal)&lt;BR /&gt;(R22 = 0.25 Starting point in Z (absolute)&lt;BR /&gt;(R24 = 0.1172 Amount of degression (incremental) without sign)&lt;BR /&gt;(R25 = 0.1172 The first drilling depth (incremental) without sign)&lt;BR /&gt;(R26 = -2 Final drilling depth (absolute)&lt;BR /&gt;(R27 = 0 Dwell time at the starting point (for chip removal)&lt;BR /&gt;(R28 = 0 Dwell time at the bottom of drilling hole (chip breaking)&lt;BR /&gt;N21 R11=1 R22=0.25 R24=0.1172 R25=0.1172 R26=-2 R27=0 R28=0&lt;BR /&gt;N22 L98 P1&lt;BR /&gt;N23 G0 X0&lt;BR /&gt;N24 G0 Z0.25&lt;BR /&gt;N25 G0 Z0.75&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;( Thread2 )&lt;BR /&gt;N26 M1&lt;BR /&gt;N27 T0 D0&lt;BR /&gt;N28 G54&lt;BR /&gt;N29 G58 Z60&lt;BR /&gt;N30 G95&lt;BR /&gt;N31 G97 S500 M3&lt;BR /&gt;N32 G0 X2.829 Z0.16&lt;BR /&gt;N33 G0 Z0.3937&lt;BR /&gt;(R20 = 0.07874015748031496 Pitch)&lt;BR /&gt;(R21 = 1.989 Start point of the thread in X)&lt;BR /&gt;(R22 = -0.4403 Start point of the thread in Z)&lt;BR /&gt;(R23 = 0 Number of idle passes)&lt;BR /&gt;(R24 = -0.04 Thread depth (positive value = inside thread, negative value = outside thread))&lt;BR /&gt;(R25 = 0.05 Finishing increment)&lt;BR /&gt;(R26 = 0.39370078740157477 Approach Path)&lt;BR /&gt;(R27 = 0 Run-Out Path)&lt;BR /&gt;(R28 = 5 Number of roughing cuts)&lt;BR /&gt;(R29 = 0 Infeed Angle)&lt;BR /&gt;(R31 = 1.989 End point of the thread in X (absolute))&lt;BR /&gt;(R32 = -2.5403 End point of the thread in z (absolute))&lt;BR /&gt;N34 R20=0.07874015748031496 R21=1.989 R22=-0.4403 R23=0 R24=-0.04 R25=0.05 R26=0.39370078740157477 R27=0 R28=5 R29=0 R31=1.989 R32=-2.5403&lt;BR /&gt;N35 L97 P1&lt;BR /&gt;N36 G0 Z0.16&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;N37 M9&lt;BR /&gt;N38 G53 G0 X0 Z0&lt;BR /&gt;N39 M30&lt;BR /&gt;%&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;holy smokes!&amp;nbsp; I'm not 100% sure if it works yet, but it's a million steps in the right direction!&amp;nbsp; I'm going to brush up on my javascript skills and start working through this.&amp;nbsp; Thank you!&amp;nbsp; this may be the answer to my problems!&amp;nbsp; Not only did it do the threading correctly with R values, it also did the drilling cycle correctly.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/6772836"&gt;@kanpowersports&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;you need to check this out if you're still working on your lathe!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2019 19:11:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/siemens-810t-l97-cycle-working-but/m-p/8912688#M13960</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-16T19:11:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Siemens 810t L97 Cycle working but..</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/siemens-810t-l97-cycle-working-but/m-p/8915809#M13961</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;for anyone following along with an EMCO 320 Lathe like mine, my post processor is attached.&amp;nbsp; it's not quite final, but is now working with canned cycles, tool retracts before changes, threading, and profiling all operational.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2019 22:43:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/siemens-810t-l97-cycle-working-but/m-p/8915809#M13961</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-17T22:43:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Siemens 810t L97 Cycle working but..</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/siemens-810t-l97-cycle-working-but/m-p/9202395#M13962</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for sharing your postprocessor.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm working on lathe with Pronum 630t control. Its using the same cycles and codes as Sinumerik 810t do, but there are a few differences.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I changed few things but there is one I have no idea how to deal with.&amp;nbsp; After each toolchange there is workoffset number. I want to have work it only in the beginning of program. How to change it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2019 12:52:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/siemens-810t-l97-cycle-working-but/m-p/9202395#M13962</guid>
      <dc:creator>pawel.piela1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-14T12:52:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Siemens 810t L97 Cycle working but..</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/siemens-810t-l97-cycle-working-but/m-p/9203407#M13963</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It's outside of my comfort zone to give advice here because I'm not very good at modifying post processors.&amp;nbsp; But generally speaking, I'd suggest that you should just look at the post processor and find where it inserts that workoffset number after each toolchange.&amp;nbsp; You can just delete the work offset call after toolchange.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Though, unless it's causing some kind of problem, I'd probably leave it in.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Dec 2019 20:32:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/siemens-810t-l97-cycle-working-but/m-p/9203407#M13963</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-15T20:32:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

