<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: sheet metal bend radius bug? in Fusion Support Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-support-forum/sheet-metal-bend-radius-bug/m-p/9163549#M130617</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;How a part is modeled and how that same part is dimensioned on a print for validation (measurement) has very little, if any, relevance to each other.&amp;nbsp; So I'm not sure what your point is.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any method used to model the exact same final part would yield the exact same flat pattern.&amp;nbsp; It has no effect on bend allowance calculations.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2019 20:31:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mrm1018</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-11-23T20:31:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>sheet metal bend radius bug?</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-support-forum/sheet-metal-bend-radius-bug/m-p/9163432#M130615</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've attached a sheet metal part that I've noticed some strange behavior of.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My desire is for all bend radius' to be the same, in this case 3/16".&amp;nbsp; However, when I use the symmetric thickness option, things get silly.&amp;nbsp; One radius is .1875 and the other is .2812.&amp;nbsp; It's only when I use the side1 or side2 thickness option that I get the desired consistent .1875 bend radius.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="bend_bug 1.JPG" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/701007i10BB0799307EA17F/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="bend_bug 1.JPG" alt="bend_bug 1.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="bend_bug 2.JPG" style="width: 833px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/701008iBA0BD61B0285E61A/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="bend_bug 2.JPG" alt="bend_bug 2.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2019 17:32:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-support-forum/sheet-metal-bend-radius-bug/m-p/9163432#M130615</guid>
      <dc:creator>mrm1018</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-23T17:32:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: sheet metal bend radius bug?</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-support-forum/sheet-metal-bend-radius-bug/m-p/9163471#M130616</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I only use function that I can physically measure (Side1 or 2, defining the outside/inside of the physical part).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I never use the "midplane" in creating sheet metal parts, given that I cannot physically measure to this imaginary location and have no idea how &lt;STRONG&gt;bend allowance&lt;/STRONG&gt; is being calculated for the flat pattern.&amp;nbsp; (I guess I could figure it out, but too lazy.)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2019 18:27:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-support-forum/sheet-metal-bend-radius-bug/m-p/9163471#M130616</guid>
      <dc:creator>TheCADWhisperer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-23T18:27:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: sheet metal bend radius bug?</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-support-forum/sheet-metal-bend-radius-bug/m-p/9163549#M130617</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;How a part is modeled and how that same part is dimensioned on a print for validation (measurement) has very little, if any, relevance to each other.&amp;nbsp; So I'm not sure what your point is.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any method used to model the exact same final part would yield the exact same flat pattern.&amp;nbsp; It has no effect on bend allowance calculations.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2019 20:31:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-support-forum/sheet-metal-bend-radius-bug/m-p/9163549#M130617</guid>
      <dc:creator>mrm1018</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-23T20:31:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

