https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-support-forum/new-joint-workflow/m-p/9548206#M112821 <P>Autocad.</P><P>What the hell have you lot done to the JOINT command!!!</P><P>It was SOO intuitive and logical to use before - why change the dialogue boxes unnecessarily AND not have help included for the new workflow. (And I don't mean the inclusion of motion)</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>You quite often seem to concentrate on cosmetics when there are much important basic things underneath which needs to be addressed - eg on screen dimension boxes still don't resize to hold the full number, you still can't use Tangent constraint easily when working on&nbsp; curved surfaces to name two during my annoyed rant</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>Being forced to accept this sort of thing is why I am against the principle of subscription software.&nbsp;<span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":pouting_face:">😡</span></P> Fri, 29 May 2020 11:20:31 GMT docara 2020-05-29T11:20:31Z https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-support-forum/new-joint-workflow/m-p/9548206#M112821 <P>Autocad.</P><P>What the hell have you lot done to the JOINT command!!!</P><P>It was SOO intuitive and logical to use before - why change the dialogue boxes unnecessarily AND not have help included for the new workflow. (And I don't mean the inclusion of motion)</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>You quite often seem to concentrate on cosmetics when there are much important basic things underneath which needs to be addressed - eg on screen dimension boxes still don't resize to hold the full number, you still can't use Tangent constraint easily when working on&nbsp; curved surfaces to name two during my annoyed rant</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>Being forced to accept this sort of thing is why I am against the principle of subscription software.&nbsp;<span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":pouting_face:">😡</span></P> Fri, 29 May 2020 11:20:31 GMT https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-support-forum/new-joint-workflow/m-p/9548206#M112821 docara 2020-05-29T11:20:31Z