<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Suggestions for how to create one part out of three in Fusion Electronics Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-electronics-forum/suggestions-for-how-to-create-one-part-out-of-three/m-p/11306484#M8690</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a radio that plugs into my board.&amp;nbsp; The radio socket is made from three headers that must be located correctly relative to each other for the radio to fit correctly.&amp;nbsp; I created one symbol for the radio, and one footprint that orients the locations for the three headers correctly.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I export a BOM, it shows the radio, but no headers.&amp;nbsp; I would like to have the headers also appear on the BOM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can add the headers to the schematic, but then they also show on the layout.&amp;nbsp; I already have the combined footprint for the radio, so I don't need the footprints for the three headers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to add the headers so they show on the BOM, but not in layout?&amp;nbsp; I tried a part with no footprint, but it will not let me add it to the schematic.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 14:51:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>robmacklin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-07-19T14:51:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Suggestions for how to create one part out of three</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-electronics-forum/suggestions-for-how-to-create-one-part-out-of-three/m-p/11306484#M8690</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a radio that plugs into my board.&amp;nbsp; The radio socket is made from three headers that must be located correctly relative to each other for the radio to fit correctly.&amp;nbsp; I created one symbol for the radio, and one footprint that orients the locations for the three headers correctly.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I export a BOM, it shows the radio, but no headers.&amp;nbsp; I would like to have the headers also appear on the BOM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can add the headers to the schematic, but then they also show on the layout.&amp;nbsp; I already have the combined footprint for the radio, so I don't need the footprints for the three headers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to add the headers so they show on the BOM, but not in layout?&amp;nbsp; I tried a part with no footprint, but it will not let me add it to the schematic.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 14:51:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-electronics-forum/suggestions-for-how-to-create-one-part-out-of-three/m-p/11306484#M8690</guid>
      <dc:creator>robmacklin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-19T14:51:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggestions for how to create one part out of three</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-electronics-forum/suggestions-for-how-to-create-one-part-out-of-three/m-p/11306937#M8691</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/10510936"&gt;@robmacklin&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I hope you're doing well. This is a tricky situation, I definitely understand the appeal of consolidating the headers as a single part. What I would recommend in this scenario is to edit the BOM to reflect the three headers that way you don't have to change the component.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The other option is to place the 3 headers and then form a persistent group on the 2D PCB. This will allow you to move them as a group preserving the relative placement between them . The advantage with this method is that the BOM is correct from the outset.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As you can see, currently neither of the options is perfect you just have to pick the tradeoff that better suits you.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 18:00:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-electronics-forum/suggestions-for-how-to-create-one-part-out-of-three/m-p/11306937#M8691</guid>
      <dc:creator>jorge_garcia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-19T18:00:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggestions for how to create one part out of three</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-electronics-forum/suggestions-for-how-to-create-one-part-out-of-three/m-p/11306947#M8692</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the help.&amp;nbsp; I've been using your first option.&amp;nbsp; I was hoping to automate it so I don't forget the manual BOM edits on each release.&amp;nbsp; Using a group might work on one schematic, but it doesn't make it very easy to use the same common footprint on other schematics.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 18:04:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-electronics-forum/suggestions-for-how-to-create-one-part-out-of-three/m-p/11306947#M8692</guid>
      <dc:creator>robmacklin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-19T18:04:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

