<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: DRC/ERC Width Errors Vs. Pad Width in Fusion Electronics Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-electronics-forum/drc-erc-width-errors-vs-pad-width/m-p/13027855#M5073</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/14043507"&gt;@jkardach3R2M3&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Today we release Fusion V2.0.20256 and now we have the new DRC engine now.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can set your own Custom Rules for the SMD separately.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For example, we can set different copper width for different scopes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot 2024-09-04 at 14.49.16.png" style="width: 300px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1410541iC84C32EE66C13C55/image-size/small?v=v2&amp;amp;px=200" role="button" title="Screenshot 2024-09-04 at 14.49.16.png" alt="Screenshot 2024-09-04 at 14.49.16.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please upgrade Fusion and have a try, thanks a lot!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Panpan Fan&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 09:10:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>panpan_fan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-09-18T09:10:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DRC/ERC Width Errors Vs. Pad Width</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-electronics-forum/drc-erc-width-errors-vs-pad-width/m-p/12245756#M5071</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4235204"&gt;@jorge_garcia&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I auto-routed a PCB and identified several nets in the RULES DRC/ERC classes to have various widths. In some solenoid circuits I wanted the trace width to be 32 mils, and added the appropriate signals into a Net Class, and assigned a rule for 32 mil trace widths.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The autorouting worked fine, but then I find that on several components using these nets I am getting Width DRC/ERC errors for certain smd pads:&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="trace width set to 32 mil, pad is 45x27mil" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1267559iA5E67C76FDF03B28/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="5cGnI.png" alt="trace width set to 32 mil, pad is 45x27mil" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;trace width set to 32 mil, pad is 45x27mil&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After struggling a bit on this, I noted that the components smd pad width was 47milsx27mils; Could the error be caused by the width of the component's pad being less than 32 mils? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I reduced the class rules for the Solenoid net from 32 mils to 27 mils and the error goes away. Is that supposed to work that way? I did not change the pad size, I did not change the trace size, I just reduced the requirement of the Class rule and no more error! &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Changed class rules to 27 mils" style="width: 618px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1267560i4307426E94E681D6/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="7IipZ.png" alt="Changed class rules to 27 mils" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;Changed class rules to 27 mils&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Seems like the DRC/ERC checker is checking SMC pads against width violations, which it really shouldn't be an error (at most a warning as you could have multiple pads to take the current). And the error goes away if you reduce the class rules to a lower number.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Seems like bug to me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jim Kardach&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2023 23:16:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-electronics-forum/drc-erc-width-errors-vs-pad-width/m-p/12245756#M5071</guid>
      <dc:creator>jkardach3R2M3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-16T23:16:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DRC/ERC Width Errors Vs. Pad Width</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-electronics-forum/drc-erc-width-errors-vs-pad-width/m-p/12248992#M5072</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/14043507"&gt;@jkardach3R2M3&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I hope you're doing well. I've passed this along to our developers for review. Thank you for bringing it up.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Let me know if there's anything else I can do for you.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2023 18:34:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-electronics-forum/drc-erc-width-errors-vs-pad-width/m-p/12248992#M5072</guid>
      <dc:creator>jorge_garcia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-18T18:34:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DRC/ERC Width Errors Vs. Pad Width</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-electronics-forum/drc-erc-width-errors-vs-pad-width/m-p/13027855#M5073</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/14043507"&gt;@jkardach3R2M3&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Today we release Fusion V2.0.20256 and now we have the new DRC engine now.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can set your own Custom Rules for the SMD separately.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For example, we can set different copper width for different scopes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot 2024-09-04 at 14.49.16.png" style="width: 300px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1410541iC84C32EE66C13C55/image-size/small?v=v2&amp;amp;px=200" role="button" title="Screenshot 2024-09-04 at 14.49.16.png" alt="Screenshot 2024-09-04 at 14.49.16.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please upgrade Fusion and have a try, thanks a lot!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Panpan Fan&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 09:10:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-electronics-forum/drc-erc-width-errors-vs-pad-width/m-p/13027855#M5073</guid>
      <dc:creator>panpan_fan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-18T09:10:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

