<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Hazy on components, assemblies, bodies, the whole nine in Fusion Design, Validate &amp; Document Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-design-validate-document/hazy-on-components-assemblies-bodies-the-whole-nine/m-p/5493871#M304643</link>
    <description>I have also used Solidworks and Inventor and it would be great to have one of the Staff or Experts on F360 do a workflow with examples comparing the 3 products, that shows us the old way (with Solidworks and/or Inventor) and the new way, to accomplish the same thing in the most economic, smart and flexible way(s) possible. I feel like I am missing out on some great workflow improvements because I don't understand what I don't even know at this point.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In starting with a Component first in my design, I am now finding myself getting lost within the timeline if I turn visibility on/off for other components, bodies or sketches and at times I cannot turn other components back on if I turn their visibility off, without exiting F360 and re-opening the file. I'm sure with more why-where-what workflow examples, my results will get better.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2015 21:59:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gwcude</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-02-03T21:59:08Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

