<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Best way to pattern components? in Fusion Design, Validate &amp; Document Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-design-validate-document/best-way-to-pattern-components/m-p/5535870#M301772</link>
    <description>Thanks for the update Phil!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;That was not the intent. This is for a common battery layout for DIY electric vehicles. It's common to have a 24x10 grid. I think the one I sent you was only 8x6 and in the video I was running 16x10. Try it out at 16x10 or 24x10 and let me know if the performance is good for you or not. The performance is incredibly good on A360 but as you say it's apples and oranges. Just trying to find the best way to make a pattern like this fast. In another thread I noticed that selecting faces is MUCH MUCH slower than selecting bodies so I wondered if there was something similar that I could apply to speeding up my patterns.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also, I don't think it's good practice to have individual components for a rectangular pattern of components... but that's just my opinion. You can have a "pattern" component in the navigation bar that is essentially the other 159 parts as a single component... then have Fusion recalculate this if you edit the pattern. Just a thought.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 23:05:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-03-10T23:05:03Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

