<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Best way to pattern components? in Fusion Design, Validate &amp; Document Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-design-validate-document/best-way-to-pattern-components/m-p/5535801#M301771</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the file. I think I found a serious bug in it. Hopefully it's already fixed for the next update. (I didn't have time to check on development builds, so an update will follow tomorrow)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do you intend for there to be two distinct separate groups of patterned components? That's what I found.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also, the performance absolutely tanks when all the origin geometry is visible. I think this was your original complaint from the video.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Otherwise, I found totally normal performance for an assembly this size. I will ensure your file gets into the performance team's hands for further analysis, but I want to be sure about the bug I found first.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for helping to make Fusion better!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 22:22:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Phil.E</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-03-10T22:22:29Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

