<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Ghosting a Body in Fusion Design, Validate &amp; Document Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-design-validate-document/ghosting-a-body/m-p/5717251#M298011</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/98350"&gt;@brianrepp﻿&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hi Brian - I somewhat disagree that here a solution is provided.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Full component ghosting is possible - check.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On a per object body basis Fusion cannot offer the same function - solution not provided.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Using a transparent material as a workaround is a dearly bad workaround for so many reason because it just adds unneded labor managing and reapplying materials forward and backwards.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A simple trans check box would be faster better and honestly the professional way to do it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 18:58:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cekuhnen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-07-13T18:58:56Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

