<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Thread Chamfer in Fusion Design, Validate &amp; Document Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-design-validate-document/thread-chamfer/m-p/6950795#M295858</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2782855"&gt;@HughesTooling&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I know....I use work arounds all the time and they are fine but as was mentioned here in the thread if they change the way Fusion calculates threads there are going to be a lot of broken files out there and a lot of headaches. So in my opinion this really needs to be fixed instead of using a hack to just get by. I will talk to Jeff again when he gets back and see if we can push something along or at least get some info on why this is not getting fixed.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 14:45:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhilProcarioJr</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-03-16T14:45:15Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

