<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Learning Fusion is like riding a bike backwards in Fusion Design, Validate &amp; Document Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-design-validate-document/learning-fusion-is-like-riding-a-bike-backwards/m-p/6016160#M282579</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;YES, YES, YES. I heartily agree!&amp;nbsp; I've had a month + of trying (January 2016) to get exactly these points across to Autodesk, but they don't quite seem to get it!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In particular, the BASIC terminology and structural concepts of Fusion 360 are not explained anywhere. E.g. I understand Project and Design, but what is a Document, a File (in F360 terms).?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Tutorials are good at SPECIFIC points, but very poor at setting the items into the wider context.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They assume you know F360 to understand the Tutorial - which of course defeats their purpose.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So YES, I totallly agree with this article. It's very frustrating - and, like you, I've used several other CAD tools before, so not new to CAD. Plus 40+ years' of expert IT knowledge, so not new to IT interfaces and concepts either.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2016 14:43:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>I_B_Jones</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-01-31T14:43:50Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

