topic Re: Manufacturing (CAM) API Feedback in Fusion API and Scripts Forum

Manufacturing (CAM) API Feedback

prainsberry — Tue, 04 Apr 2023 00:36:01 GMT

With the latest Fusion 360 release, available starting today, you will see a huge increase in the APIs available for the manufacturing workspace. This is a massive release, that I know many of you have been waiting for!

See here for a comprehensive list of these new capabilities.

You'll notice that all of the new Manufacture functionality is designated as being in "Preview". We're being cautious and releasing it as a preview, so we can react to problems and suggestions for improvement and be open to making changes that might break compatibility.

Please test it out and let us know in this thread:

If you find something that doesn't work.
If something doesn't make sense.
If the documentation needs to be improved.
Also, feel free to share successes with the capabilities.

Depending on the feedback we get, the plan is to take it out of preview after one or two major releases.

Re: Manufacturing (CAM) API Feedback

kandennti — Wed, 05 Apr 2023 02:10:43 GMT

Thanks for the great work.

It would be useful to add a method to the PostConfiguration object that can income a list of post properties in the cps file.

I don't have an answer to this question, but perhaps there is no smart way to do this.

https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-360-api-and-scripts/post-processor-and-pyton-script/td-p/11818059

Re: Manufacturing (CAM) API Feedback

MichaelT_123 — Wed, 05 Apr 2023 04:41:35 GMT

Great Job TF360,

Please check API page:

https://help.autodesk.com/view/fusion360/ENU/?guid=GUID-C6B71469-9BE3-46EE-B961-E254324DEB1F

There is missing reference link to:

SectionAnalysisInput

Regards

MichaelT

Re: Manufacturing (CAM) API Feedback

kandennti — Thu, 06 Apr 2023 00:33:37 GMT

I created the following script thinking that DocumentToolLibrary could be easily copied by using the toJson and createFromJson methods of the DocumentToolLibrary object.

# Fusion360API Python script import traceback import adsk.core as core import adsk.cam as cam import json def run(context): ui: core.UserInterface = None try: app: core.Application = core.Application.get() ui = app.userInterface # アクティブドキュメントのツールライブラリ # https://help.autodesk.com/view/fusion360/ENU/?guid=GUID-C0A61669-1C70-4A68-8CAA-158108844FC7 stateToolLib: cam.DocumentToolLibrary = get_cam_product().documentToolLibrary ui.messageBox(f'Active DocumentToolLibrary Count:{stateToolLib.count}') if stateToolLib.count < 1: return # json化 toolLibJson = stateToolLib.toJson() print(json.dumps(json.loads(toolLibJson), indent=2)) # 新規ドキュメント app.documents.add(core.DocumentTypes.FusionDesignDocumentType) # 新規ドキュメントのツールライブラリ newToolLib: cam.DocumentToolLibrary = get_cam_product().documentToolLibrary # 新規ドキュメントのツールライブラリにインポート newToolLib.createFromJson(toolLibJson) ui.messageBox(f'New DocumentToolLibrary Count:{newToolLib.count}') except: if ui: ui.messageBox('Failed:\n{}'.format(traceback.format_exc())) def get_cam_product() -> cam.CAM: ''' CAMの取得 ''' app: core.Application = core.Application.get() activete_cam_env() return app.activeProduct def activete_cam_env() -> None: ''' CAMアクティブ ''' app: core.Application = core.Application.get() ui: core.UserInterface = app.userInterface camWS: core.Workspace = ui.workspaces.itemById('CAMEnvironment') camWS.activate()

No error was generated, but no tool was created in the newly created document.

(ver2.0.15775)

Please let me know if there is anything wrong with my method.

Re: Manufacturing (CAM) API Feedback

kandennti — Thu, 06 Apr 2023 00:47:09 GMT

I misunderstood the return value of the createFromJson method.
It turns out that we can simply add without using json.

# Fusion360API Python script import traceback import adsk.core as core import adsk.cam as cam def run(context): ui: core.UserInterface = None try: app: core.Application = core.Application.get() ui = app.userInterface # active doc toollibrary # https://help.autodesk.com/view/fusion360/ENU/?guid=GUID-C0A61669-1C70-4A68-8CAA-158108844FC7 stateToolLib: cam.DocumentToolLibrary = get_cam_product().documentToolLibrary ui.messageBox(f'Active DocumentToolLibrary Count:{stateToolLib.count}') if stateToolLib.count < 1: return # new doc toollibrary app.documents.add(core.DocumentTypes.FusionDesignDocumentType) newToolLib: cam.DocumentToolLibrary = get_cam_product().documentToolLibrary # import tools [newToolLib.add(t) for t in stateToolLib] ui.messageBox(f'New DocumentToolLibrary Count:{newToolLib.count}') except: if ui: ui.messageBox('Failed:\n{}'.format(traceback.format_exc()))

Re: Manufacturing (CAM) API Feedback

kandennti — Thu, 06 Apr 2023 02:17:10 GMT

I tested changing the tool number.

# Fusion360API Python script import traceback import adsk.core as core import adsk.cam as cam def run(context): ui: core.UserInterface = None try: app: core.Application = core.Application.get() ui = app.userInterface # Active Doc ToolLibrary activeToolLib: cam.DocumentToolLibrary = get_cam_product().documentToolLibrary if activeToolLib.count < 1: return # get tool tool: cam.Tool = activeToolLib[0] # get tool_number Parameter prm: cam.CAMParameter = tool.parameters.itemByName('tool_number') # change tool_number prm.value.value += 1 # ToolLibrary Update # https://help.autodesk.com/view/fusion360/ENU/?guid=GUID-34200AFB-2CC9-463D-8BCC-502F57D1E81B activeToolLib.update(tool, True) except: if ui: ui.messageBox('Failed:\n{}'.format(traceback.format_exc())) def get_cam_product() -> cam.CAM: ''' CAMの取得 ''' app: core.Application = core.Application.get() activete_cam_env() return app.activeProduct def activete_cam_env() -> None: ''' CAMアクティブ ''' app: core.Application = core.Application.get() ui: core.UserInterface = app.userInterface camWS: core.Workspace = ui.workspaces.itemById('CAMEnvironment') camWS.activate()

I noticed that the tool number is not changed unless the DocumentToolLibrary.update method is used, but since the second argument in the document is listed as "updateFeedAndSpeed", I misunderstood that it was only about the cutting condition.

https://help.autodesk.com/view/fusion360/ENU/?guid=GUID-34200AFB-2CC9-463D-8BCC-502F57D1E81B

Also, even if the second argument is set to false, the update is still performed, so I did not understand what the parameter meant.

Re: Manufacturing (CAM) API Feedback

kandennti — Fri, 07 Apr 2023 00:11:18 GMT

Sorry for repeating myself.

I understand the meaning of the second argument of the update method.

We create one tool and create a DRILL operation.
The settings are as follows

Next, run the script to halve the spindle speed.
The second argument is "True".

# Fusion360API Python script import traceback import adsk.core as core import adsk.cam as cam def run(context): ui: core.UserInterface = None try: app: core.Application = core.Application.get() ui = app.userInterface # Active Doc ToolLibrary activeToolLib: cam.DocumentToolLibrary = get_cam_product().documentToolLibrary if activeToolLib.count < 1: return # get tool tool: cam.Tool = activeToolLib[0] # get preset presets: cam.ToolPresets = tool.presets preset: cam.ToolPreset = presets.itemsByName('Default preset')[0] # change spindleSpeed prm: cam.CAMParameter = preset.parameters.itemByName('tool_spindleSpeed') prm.value.value /= 2 # ToolLibrary Update activeToolLib.update(tool, True) except: if ui: ui.messageBox('Failed:\n{}'.format(traceback.format_exc())) def get_cam_product() -> cam.CAM: ''' CAMの取得 ''' app: core.Application = core.Application.get() activete_cam_env() return app.activeProduct def activete_cam_env() -> None: ''' CAMアクティブ ''' app: core.Application = core.Application.get() ui: core.UserInterface = app.userInterface camWS: core.Workspace = ui.workspaces.itemById('CAMEnvironment') camWS.activate()

The result is shown here.

The spindle speed has been halved on both the operation side and the tool library side.

Restore the spindle speed and modify the script.

・・・ # ToolLibrary Update # activeToolLib.update(tool, True) activeToolLib.update(tool, False) ・・・

Here is the result of the script execution.

The tool library has been changed as intended.
The spindle speed of the operation is not changed, but Preset is changed to "Custom".

I understood the meaning of the second argument to be whether or not it affects the cutting conditions of the already created operation.
However, it should be noted that if "False" is selected, Preset will be changed to "Custom".

Re: Manufacturing (CAM) API Feedback

Joshua.mursic — Thu, 06 Apr 2023 21:14:56 GMT

Hello!

Is it possible to give the SetupInput an occurrences origin axis as an input? Or to give it a sketch line as an axis?

The expression just always says true if anything is selected, and the value is CadAxis no matter what is selected.

Being able to select a sketch or origin axis as an input would be really helpful in creating setups. The box point option works great for milling operations but is not available for turning operations.

# set setup origin setup.parameters.itemByName('wcs_origin_boxPoint').value.value = SetupWCSPoint.TOP_XMIN_YMIN.value

Re: Manufacturing (CAM) API Feedback

kandennti — Fri, 07 Apr 2023 00:01:36 GMT

The sample code on the following page is broken because it is not displayed as code.

https://help.autodesk.com/view/fusion360/ENU/?guid=GUID-6B9555DF-0F90-4F46-B3F6-EADE8A87C4C9

Perhaps, this is a sample like this.

# Get a reference to the CAMManager object. camMgr = adsk.cam.CAMManager.get() # Get the ToolLibraries object. toolLibs = camMgr.libraryManager.toolLibraries # Get the URL for the local libraries. localLibLocationURL = toolLibs.urlByLocation(adsk.cam.LibraryLocations.LocalLibraryLocation) # Get the URL of the folder, which will be for the "CustomTools" folder. f360FolderURLs = toolLibs.childFolderURLs(localLibLocationURL) customToolsFolderURL = f360FolderURLs[0] # Get the "CustomMilling" library. f360LibraryURLs = toolLibs.childAssetURLs(customToolsFolderURL) toolLib = None for libURL in f360LibraryURLs: if 'CustomMilling' in libURL.leafName: toolLib = toolLibs.toolLibraryAtURL(libURL) # Find a specific tool. for tool in toolLib: if tool.parameters.itemByName('tool_description').value.value == '1/16" Ball Endmill': return tool return None return None

Re: Manufacturing (CAM) API Feedback

kandennti — Fri, 07 Apr 2023 00:54:21 GMT

Hi @Joshua.mursic .

For SetupInput, it is stated to be set after it is created because there are only minimal inputs.

https://help.autodesk.com/view/fusion360/ENU/?guid=GUID-7F3F9D48-ED88-451A-907C-82EAE67DEA93

I made a sample where Setup is created by Turning and the origin of WCS is the origin of the root component.

# Fusion360API Python script import traceback import adsk.core as core import adsk.fusion as fusion import adsk.cam as cam import pprint def run(context): ui: core.UserInterface = None try: app: core.Application = core.Application.get() ui = app.userInterface # get cam object camObj: cam.CAM = get_cam_product() # create setup - turning setups: cam.Setups = camObj.setups setupIpt: cam.SetupInput = setups.createInput(cam.OperationTypes.TurningOperation) setup: cam.Setup = setups.add(setupIpt) # get origin point desRootOcc: fusion.Occurrence = camObj.designRootOccurrence root: fusion.Component = desRootOcc.component origin: fusion.ConstructionPoint = root.originConstructionPoint # set wcs mode wcsModePrm: cam.CAMParameter = setup.parameters.itemByName('wcs_orientation_mode') wcsModeValue: cam.ChoiceParameterValue = wcsModePrm.value pprint.pprint(wcsModeValue.getChoices()) wcsModeValue.value = 'coordinateSystem' # set wcs origin wcscSysPrm: cam.CAMParameter = setup.parameters.itemByName('wcs_orientation_cSys') wcscSysValue: cam.CadObjectParameterValue = wcscSysPrm.value wcscSysValue.value = [origin] except: if ui: ui.messageBox('Failed:\n{}'.format(traceback.format_exc())) def get_cam_product() -> cam.CAM: ''' CAMの取得 ''' app: core.Application = core.Application.get() activete_cam_env() return app.activeProduct def activete_cam_env() -> None: ''' CAMアクティブ ''' camEnvId = 'CAMEnvironment' app: core.Application = core.Application.get() ui: core.UserInterface = app.userInterface if ui.activeWorkspace.id == camEnvId: return camWS: core.Workspace = ui.workspaces.itemById(camEnvId) camWS.activate()

Re: Manufacturing (CAM) API Feedback

Joshua.mursic — Mon, 10 Apr 2023 12:13:55 GMT

Thank you very much

Re: Manufacturing (CAM) API Feedback

Joshua.mursic — Mon, 10 Apr 2023 15:07:39 GMT

is anyone else getting the "Failed to write job file" error on toolpaths when using:

cam.generateAllToolpaths(False)

it can be resolved easily by simply regenerating the toolpath manually. I am just not sure the cause of the error in the first place.

Re: Manufacturing (CAM) API Feedback

kandennti — Tue, 11 Apr 2023 01:59:39 GMT

@Joshua.mursic .

Without publishing the f3d files and scripts, no one will be able to find out the cause.

I have experienced crashes in the generateToolpath method when processing at startup.

https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-360-api-and-scripts/run-on-startup-addin-problem/m-p/11867248#M18729

Re: Manufacturing (CAM) API Feedback

ltomuta — Tue, 11 Apr 2023 09:32:06 GMT

I have a design for which simply enumerating CAMProduct's existing NCPrograms is enough to crash Fusion (several crashes should be logged yesterday under my email, all caused by this bug).

try: for pro in cam.ncPrograms: pass except: pass

The code is impossible to debug as simply adding the pro object to the Watch window in VSC's debugger causes Fusion to crash.

Re: Manufacturing (CAM) API Feedback

nicole.debowski — Tue, 11 Apr 2023 07:01:37 GMT

@kandennti Thanks for all your feedback below, it is much appreciated!

I don't quite get what you're asking for in the first post though. The entry you have posted refers to the old post processing workflow, whereas PostConfiguration is meant to be used with NCProgram objects. NCProgram contains two lists of CAMParameters, one is accessible via the parameters property (essentially, in the UI the left hand side of the NCProgram dialog and the other tab), the other via the postParameters property (the right side). The latter is the one containing the properties you're looking for. Since those are CAMParameters and not NamedValues, you can easily check whether a property exists and change it according to your needs.

We have decided against making those parameters available in PostConfiguration, as that object mirrors a .cps file itself and not the values within. The UI behaves similarly: you can change the values only in the NCPrograms dialog, an attempt to edit the post via the library will result in the user editing the .cps file directly.

Re: Manufacturing (CAM) API Feedback

nicole.debowski — Tue, 11 Apr 2023 07:40:15 GMT

@ltomuta I have found the reports, but I have not been able to reproduce the issues on my end, iterating and inspecting the NCProgram objects worked fine (in a fairly primitive test case). Inside the reports calls to the NCProgram's operations property fail. Is there any change you can share your design with us?

Re: Manufacturing (CAM) API Feedback

kandennti — Tue, 11 Apr 2023 09:17:03 GMT

@nicole.debowski .

Thanks for the replies.

I think you are lacking in understanding because of the large number of features added.
No problem.

Re: Manufacturing (CAM) API Feedback

nicole.debowski — Tue, 11 Apr 2023 11:30:20 GMT

@kandennti: My lack of understanding does not stem from the features added, but may instead come from workflows we have not considered while designing the new API functions or have intended to work differently. The new API around posts and post processing relates to what users see in the UI, but not to the old way of posting via CAM.postProcess(...). If you could please elaborate a bit further about what you feel is missing around posting via NCPrograms (or any new functionality for that matter!), we could figure out whether this has been covered in a different manner users may not expect and thus need better examples, or whether we need to look into implementing that.

Re: Manufacturing (CAM) API Feedback

Joshua.mursic — Thu, 20 Apr 2023 21:42:45 GMT

I have a strange case.

I am trying to modify the bottom height for my operation

this parameter is expecting a "CadObjectParameterValue". I am not sure if a construction point counts as this, but the selection field accepts it.

rotaryRoughOp = mainSetup.operations.item(3) rotaryRoughOp.parameters.itemByName("bottomHeight_ref").value.value = [lowPoint] # lowPoint: adsk.fusion.ConstructionPoint

The issue is that the bottom plane that is generated is not at the correct height.

you can see the point that was selected and way below it is the bottom height plane that is created.

Re: Manufacturing (CAM) API Feedback

Joshua.mursic — Thu, 20 Apr 2023 21:57:37 GMT

I assume the issue was that I was giving it a construction point, when I converted that same point into a sketchPoint and then fed that into the parameter it is working correctly.