<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Pocket is machined smaller than what it should be. in FeatureCAM Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/featurecam-forum/pocket-is-machined-smaller-than-what-it-should-be/m-p/8635391#M3346</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;@Anonymous&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The reason is that your feature is a roughing operation and the Finish allowance is set to .050'', that explain why you were about .100'' or so undersized in diameter on the first run.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Finish allowance.PNG" style="width: 745px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/609685i49FE72D860432BDF/image-dimensions/745x362?v=v2" width="745" height="362" role="button" title="Finish allowance.PNG" alt="Finish allowance.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2019 19:11:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-04T19:11:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Pocket is machined smaller than what it should be.</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/featurecam-forum/pocket-is-machined-smaller-than-what-it-should-be/m-p/8627927#M3345</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are making a simple circular piece with 8 equal pockets with a draft angle using a 1" tool and a 0.015 z increment. The problem is that the curve used for the feature has a diameter of 1.99", and when we machined the first pocket, it had a diameter of 1.88". I checked the toolpaths and it was actually only opening to 1.88" instead of 1.99". A quick solution I did was creating a curve with a larger diameter to compensate the difference and it worked. Nevertheless, I want to know the reason this happened, since I can´t find an explanation. Thank you in advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 15:30:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/featurecam-forum/pocket-is-machined-smaller-than-what-it-should-be/m-p/8627927#M3345</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-28T15:30:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pocket is machined smaller than what it should be.</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/featurecam-forum/pocket-is-machined-smaller-than-what-it-should-be/m-p/8635391#M3346</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;@Anonymous&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The reason is that your feature is a roughing operation and the Finish allowance is set to .050'', that explain why you were about .100'' or so undersized in diameter on the first run.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Finish allowance.PNG" style="width: 745px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/609685i49FE72D860432BDF/image-dimensions/745x362?v=v2" width="745" height="362" role="button" title="Finish allowance.PNG" alt="Finish allowance.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2019 19:11:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/featurecam-forum/pocket-is-machined-smaller-than-what-it-should-be/m-p/8635391#M3346</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-04T19:11:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pocket is machined smaller than what it should be.</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/featurecam-forum/pocket-is-machined-smaller-than-what-it-should-be/m-p/8636350#M3347</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you so much! You really helped me since I'm just starting out &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 05:12:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/featurecam-forum/pocket-is-machined-smaller-than-what-it-should-be/m-p/8636350#M3347</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-05T05:12:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

