<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IPC-2581 in EAGLE Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/eagle-forum/ipc-2581/m-p/8019323#M33649</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4235204"&gt;@jorge_garcia&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;+1 for IPC-2581 output from Eagle&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2018 21:03:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-05-22T21:03:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IPC-2581</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/eagle-forum/ipc-2581/m-p/7336057#M33645</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have been using Cadsoft/Autodsk Eagle for quite some time and have had very few issues. &amp;nbsp;However, recently, my preferred local board assembly house has been requesting IPC-2581 ASCII design files in addition to the usual Gerbers, netlist and BoM files. &amp;nbsp;I have not been able to find any information about IPC-2581 support on the Autodesk website and a call to the Cadsoft support desk confirmed that there is nonsupport for that standard in the current version. &amp;nbsp;Are there plans to include support for IPC-2581 in a future release of Eagle? &amp;nbsp;The ability to supply IPC-2581 files significantly reduces the engineering costs for assembly at my preferred vendor. &amp;nbsp;Thanks, Colin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 14:12:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/eagle-forum/ipc-2581/m-p/7336057#M33645</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-29T14:12:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPC-2581</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/eagle-forum/ipc-2581/m-p/7342854#M33646</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;@Anonymous,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I hope you're doing well. There are plans to support this and ODB++ in the near future but I don't have an exact time line at this moment. There is a lot going on right now but keep your eyes peeled.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please let me know if there's anything else I can do for you.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 16:55:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/eagle-forum/ipc-2581/m-p/7342854#M33646</guid>
      <dc:creator>jorge_garcia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-31T16:55:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPC-2581</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/eagle-forum/ipc-2581/m-p/7352758#M33647</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Jorge: Thanks for the update. &amp;nbsp;I hope Autodesk will publish the IPC-2581 feature when it is released, perhaps in the newsletters. It would be great if we could know the timeline at some point. &amp;nbsp;Best regards, Colin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 16:52:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/eagle-forum/ipc-2581/m-p/7352758#M33647</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-04T16:52:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPC-2581</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/eagle-forum/ipc-2581/m-p/7674609#M33648</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is a new version of CAM PCB-Investigator V9 which supports EAGLE XML import to convert it direct to ODB++ and many other formats like&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;IPC 2581&lt;/SPAN&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.pcb-investigator.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://www.pcb-investigator.com/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 10:25:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/eagle-forum/ipc-2581/m-p/7674609#M33648</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-09T10:25:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPC-2581</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/eagle-forum/ipc-2581/m-p/8019323#M33649</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4235204"&gt;@jorge_garcia&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;+1 for IPC-2581 output from Eagle&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2018 21:03:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/eagle-forum/ipc-2581/m-p/8019323#M33649</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-22T21:03:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPC-2581</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/eagle-forum/ipc-2581/m-p/9868293#M33650</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm in the same boat, and am disappointed that there doesn't appear to have been progress on this in the last 2 years.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Adrian&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2020 20:34:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/eagle-forum/ipc-2581/m-p/9868293#M33650</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-13T20:34:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

