<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: who uses view frames for small projects- in Civil 3D Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/civil-3d-forum/who-uses-view-frames-for-small-projects/m-p/5482903#M247249</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;These "best practices" can be useful, and&amp;nbsp; I doubt "your are doing it all wrong"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Not to go too far off topic but I fancy myself a HO model railroader, and all the books and mukitymuks say you should never exceed 2% on your model railroad. But the largest&amp;nbsp;manufacturer of HO train supplies provides pre-formed grade kits for 1%, 2%, 3% and 4%.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now if you should never exceed 2% on you model railroad why would the largest mfg bother to make 3 &amp;amp; 4?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;the point is; &amp;nbsp;the plan production tools offers you the ability to add all layouts to the current drawing - so what do you think they had in mind?&amp;nbsp; Flexibility for the users.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can do everything in one file. do I recommend doing that, no, but its your drawing and it might work for you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:19:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joe-Bouza</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-01-26T18:19:20Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

