<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Wall Forces at cylindrical structures in CFD Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/cfd-forum/wall-forces-at-cylindrical-structures/m-p/6281371#M18932</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;to the first question: the results of wall_force_history (.csv file in project folder, with flags&amp;nbsp;"Wall_force_History" and "Resid_bdry_force_calc")&amp;nbsp;and the results of the Wall Calculator in the programm itselts differ in some simulations. But I am working on this, maybe I have to refine some meshing, timesteps or the like.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With the two mentioned flags I get the csv-file but there are empty rows and text in it. I would be nicer to just have the values over time to look at it in excel.&amp;nbsp;API might be a solution, but it would be easy just to chance the wall_force_history flag.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I get so good and reliable results I will post them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:46:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-04-20T08:46:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Wall Forces at cylindrical structures</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/cfd-forum/wall-forces-at-cylindrical-structures/m-p/6272867#M18930</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;as I am writing my master thesis I am also working with Autodesk CFD. I want to get some surface results around cylindrical structures in air at different Reynolds-numbers (keyword: karman vortex street). I run simulations with a 2D cylinder (d=30mm), transient, sst k_omega with time steps around 0.0002s.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the c_p values (pressure value in the front)&amp;nbsp;the results seem to be alright. Now I would like to measure c_d/c_f (force value at the whole structure in one direction). I tried the Wall Calculator (for Fx) and I'm also working with the Flags "Wall_force_History" and "Resid_bdry_force_calc" to get the wall function over time (to get Fy(t)). Unfortunately the results don't match (for the last time step). I also tried different simulations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;What is the difference and which are correct?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Is there another way to calculate the forces on the structure?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Can I somehow get the&amp;nbsp;flag-files&amp;nbsp;to make modifications or write my own? I can't find them in the Autodesk CFD folder.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2016 13:03:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/cfd-forum/wall-forces-at-cylindrical-structures/m-p/6272867#M18930</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-15T13:03:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wall Forces at cylindrical structures</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/cfd-forum/wall-forces-at-cylindrical-structures/m-p/6276095#M18931</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Looks like an interesting project, feel free to share some images or videos once you have it run out!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Could you re-ask your first question? Not sure what you mean.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The Wall Calculator should be OK here I think&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don't think you can modify the flags but you could use the API, it depends what you are looking to achieve though?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 09:56:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/cfd-forum/wall-forces-at-cylindrical-structures/m-p/6276095#M18931</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jon.Wilde</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-18T09:56:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wall Forces at cylindrical structures</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/cfd-forum/wall-forces-at-cylindrical-structures/m-p/6281371#M18932</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;to the first question: the results of wall_force_history (.csv file in project folder, with flags&amp;nbsp;"Wall_force_History" and "Resid_bdry_force_calc")&amp;nbsp;and the results of the Wall Calculator in the programm itselts differ in some simulations. But I am working on this, maybe I have to refine some meshing, timesteps or the like.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With the two mentioned flags I get the csv-file but there are empty rows and text in it. I would be nicer to just have the values over time to look at it in excel.&amp;nbsp;API might be a solution, but it would be easy just to chance the wall_force_history flag.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I get so good and reliable results I will post them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:46:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/cfd-forum/wall-forces-at-cylindrical-structures/m-p/6281371#M18932</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-20T08:46:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wall Forces at cylindrical structures</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/cfd-forum/wall-forces-at-cylindrical-structures/m-p/6284195#M18933</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So I did some more simulations to find out if the wall-forces of the wallCalculator (last step) and of the.csv-file (last entry), written by the flags "Wall_force_History" and "Resid_bdry_force_calc" are alike. It seems that the reynoldsnumber has an impact. With Re=10^7 the results are the same - for Re&amp;lt;10^5 the results differ up to a factor 20.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My simulations parameters are:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Circulare shape (diameter: 3mm, 30mm, 3000mm)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Inlet: u = 1 - 5000m/s, outlet: pressure, sides: slip&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mesh Refinement at the structure - meshsize 2mm - 0.2mm&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No. of Layer 10-15,&amp;nbsp;Layer enhancement 1.5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ADV 5&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Turbulence model: k-omega SST&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steady state&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Around 2500 iterations&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Simulation, which did have the same results:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;D = 30 mm, u = 5000 m/s, mesh: 2mm-0.2mm&lt;SPAN&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; --&amp;gt; Re = 10^7&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;D = 3000 mm, u = 50 m/s, mesh: 2mm - 0.2mm&lt;SPAN&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; --&amp;gt; Re = 10^7&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;D = 30 mm, u = 10 m/s, mesh: 2mm BUT k-omega SAS&lt;SPAN&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; --&amp;gt; Re &amp;lt;&amp;nbsp;10^5&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Simulation, which did NOT have the same results&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;D = 3mm, u = 50 m/s,&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;mesh: 2mm-0.2mm &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; --&amp;gt; Re = 10^5&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;D = 30mm, u = 50 m/s,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;mesh: 2mm-0.2mm &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; --&amp;gt; Re = 10^5&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;D = 30mm, u = 1, 5, 10, 20, 30 m/s,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;mesh: 2mm &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; --&amp;gt; Re &amp;lt; 10^5&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Till now I haven´t done any simulations with around Re=10^6...&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Do I still have any mistake in my simulations? How do the flags&amp;nbsp;"&lt;SPAN&gt;Wall_force_History" and "&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Resid_bdry_force_calc" calculate the WallForces?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 12:25:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/cfd-forum/wall-forces-at-cylindrical-structures/m-p/6284195#M18933</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-21T12:25:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wall Forces at cylindrical structures</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/cfd-forum/wall-forces-at-cylindrical-structures/m-p/6317458#M18934</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;And I did some more simulations - same setup but different turbulence models.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Results:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The k-omega models RC (both) and the k-omega with the flag "sst_new_iwf" gives with all re-numbers the&amp;nbsp;same results for the WallCalculator and the WallForceHistory in the same simulation. The models k-omega, k-omega DES and k-omega SAS just have the same results with really high re-numbers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This brings me back to my question:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What it the difference between getting WallForces of the WallCalculator and the WallForceHistory in the same simulation??!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As i would think the WallForceHistory just recodes the results getting of the WallCalculator, BUT this seems not to be the&amp;nbsp;case!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 09:24:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/cfd-forum/wall-forces-at-cylindrical-structures/m-p/6317458#M18934</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-10T09:24:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

