<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Annotative scaling xref issue ... in AutoCAD Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/autocad-forum/annotative-scaling-xref-issue/m-p/5596000#M332801</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I could do with a bit of help regarding annotative scaling of some objects within&amp;nbsp;an xref generated by Civil3D, but I've&amp;nbsp;no&amp;nbsp;experience of sorting out issues with annotative objects.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The situation is that I have a dwg that's been generated by Civil3D which contains blocks which use annotative scaling (long sections).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I look at the long sections in the XREF dwg file, the blocks appear as I would expect them to do if they were&amp;nbsp;standard blocks generated to be presented at 1:250, both in PS and MS. &amp;nbsp;See Civil3D.png attachment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, when I attach the XREF to my working dwg things go astray. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When viewed in MS the sections appear as they do in the xref file, but when I look at the sections in PS viewport, the objects&amp;nbsp;are tiny, approx 1:250th of the scale that they should be. &amp;nbsp;See Vanilla.png attachment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As I say, my experience of&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;annotative scaling is extremely limited, and nobody else in the office can shed any light on the subject as we all seem to be KISS Acad dinosaurs ...&amp;nbsp;&lt;img id="smileywink" class="emoticon emoticon-smileywink" src="https://forums.autodesk.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-wink.png" alt="Smiley Wink" title="Smiley Wink" /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We've managed to&amp;nbsp;check some basic settings, and so far we've confirmed that the DDUNITS are set to Meters(!) in both dwg's, and that the&amp;nbsp;CANNOSCALE are both set with a scale names of "1:250", also that&amp;nbsp;the paper units and drawing units have identical&amp;nbsp;values in both dwgs, but other than that we're in the dark.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So what are we missing, what should I be checking in the C3D xref, and what should I be checking in my dwg?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Cheers ...&amp;nbsp;&lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://forums.autodesk.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 22:07:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>John_in_NZ</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-04-16T22:07:34Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

