<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: More rendering failure in ACA2016 in AutoCAD Architecture Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/autocad-architecture-forum/more-rendering-failure-in-aca2016/m-p/5683849#M24934</link>
    <description>Unfortunately, you read way more into my reply that the intention. That's the problem with typed replies, your interpretations are not checked by any other clues written. Taken out of context in quotes expands on those thoughts. A way to help you in the future (difficult if you access these forums on a mobile device: look at the IN REPLY TO line for each response and consider it a good way to understand what is meant for you and what is not. I find it useful in better following a thread inside a topic post.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Honestly, a few of us hijacked your thread and were for the most part not talking about you or your actual error, just among ourselves. You were cut out completely.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If I wanted to personally attack or belittle you there would be no mistake about it: sadly, that was not the case here in any reply of mine directed at you.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Work on it if the original command error is an actual glitch, looks like a staffer offered to assist.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 21:22:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pendean</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-06-18T21:22:14Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

