<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Document review process in Forma for Construction Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/forma-for-construction-forum/document-review-process/m-p/14248507#M4448</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/18875230"&gt;@tidiane_diaclient&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately for users within a group step, there is only one due date that can be assigned to this step, although you can add the users as key reviewers and then select the option that each key reviewer has to review the information before the next step can commence. That way, you could initiate a 5 or 6 working day timeline to this review step and the users within the step can then delegate who takes more time to do their review within this step than the others within the 5 or 6 day timeline. Not ideal but could be a workaround.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For projects with high volumes of files that need to go through a review process, you could enable the roll back to initiator option within the review template settings at each step. This will encapsulate the review into one unique review ID with multiple rounds if a review step is rejected and reduce the number of separate reviews across on the project.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Andrew&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 22:22:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>atighe84</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-08-28T22:22:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Document review process</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/forma-for-construction-forum/document-review-process/m-p/14237608#M4423</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;Users &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;have&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;reported&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;that&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;the&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;document&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;review&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;process&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;involves&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;too&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;many&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;configuration&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;settings,&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;making&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;it&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;time-consuming.&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;There&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;is&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;a&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;need&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;to&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;simplify&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;the&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;process&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;to&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;improve&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;efficiency&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;and&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;make&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;it&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;easier&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;for&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;users&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;to&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;complete&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;document&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;reviews.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 18:39:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/forma-for-construction-forum/document-review-process/m-p/14237608#M4423</guid>
      <dc:creator>tidiane_diaclient</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-08-18T18:39:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Document review process</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/forma-for-construction-forum/document-review-process/m-p/14241175#M4428</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/18875230"&gt;@tidiane_diaclient&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The review workflows are set up in a way that you have multiple options to configure how a user can respond or action how the review step is responded to. This ensures that you can get the right response to tailor and influence the outcome of the review in question on the project.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a certain review workflow that you and your team are having configuration issues with?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Andrew&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:20:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/forma-for-construction-forum/document-review-process/m-p/14241175#M4428</guid>
      <dc:creator>atighe84</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-08-22T00:20:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Document review process</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/forma-for-construction-forum/document-review-process/m-p/14247834#M4443</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/5624495"&gt;@atighe84&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Thank&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;you&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;for&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;the&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;reply&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;The&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;feedback&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;we&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;are&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;receiving&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;is&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;not&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;necessarily&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;related&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;to&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;a&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;specific&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;workflow&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;configuration&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;issue,&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;but&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;rather&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;to&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;some&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;limitations&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;and&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;usability&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;challenges&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;encountered&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;when&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;using&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;the&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;review&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;workflows.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;For&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;example,&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;when&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;reviews&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;are&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;configured&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;as&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;a&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;parallel&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;review&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;group&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;we&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;do&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;not&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;see&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;a&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;way&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;to&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;assign&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;different&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;review&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;due&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;dates&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;to&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;each&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;entity&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;or&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;reviewer&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;within&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;the&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;same&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;group&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;. A single deadline applies to the entire review stage, whereas some &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;teams&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;would&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;like&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;certain&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;reviewers&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;to&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;have&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;shorter&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;or&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;longer&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;review&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;periods&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;than&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;others.&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;From&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;what&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;we&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;can&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;see,&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;this&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;level&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;of&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;control&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;is&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;only&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;achievable&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;through&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;sequential&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;review&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;workflows&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;where&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;each&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;reviewer&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;has&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;their&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;own&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;review&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;step&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;and&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;due&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;date.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;In&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;addition,&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;some&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;users&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;have&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;raised&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;concerns&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;about&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;the&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;number&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;of&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;clicks&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;and&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;configuration&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;steps&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;required&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;to&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;complete&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;or&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;manage&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;reviews&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;. They feel that the review process can become quite time-consuming, especially on &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;projects&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;with&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;a&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;high&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;volume&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;of&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;documents&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;and&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;frequent&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;review&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;cycles.&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;As&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;a&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;result,&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;there&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;is&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;a&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;recurring&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;request&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;to&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;simplify&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;the&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;user&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;experience&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;and&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;reduce&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;the&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;number&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;of&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;actions&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;needed&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;to&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;perform&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;common&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;review&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;tasks.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;These&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;are&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;the&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;types&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;of&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;pain&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;points&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;that&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;we have&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Tidiane&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 09:01:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/forma-for-construction-forum/document-review-process/m-p/14247834#M4443</guid>
      <dc:creator>tidiane_diaclient</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-08-28T09:01:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Document review process</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/forma-for-construction-forum/document-review-process/m-p/14248507#M4448</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/18875230"&gt;@tidiane_diaclient&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately for users within a group step, there is only one due date that can be assigned to this step, although you can add the users as key reviewers and then select the option that each key reviewer has to review the information before the next step can commence. That way, you could initiate a 5 or 6 working day timeline to this review step and the users within the step can then delegate who takes more time to do their review within this step than the others within the 5 or 6 day timeline. Not ideal but could be a workaround.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For projects with high volumes of files that need to go through a review process, you could enable the roll back to initiator option within the review template settings at each step. This will encapsulate the review into one unique review ID with multiple rounds if a review step is rejected and reduce the number of separate reviews across on the project.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Andrew&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 22:22:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/forma-for-construction-forum/document-review-process/m-p/14248507#M4448</guid>
      <dc:creator>atighe84</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-08-28T22:22:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

