<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Link Revit - FBX file empty in 3ds Max Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/3ds-max-forum/link-revit-fbx-file-empty/m-p/5626626#M88424</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Great! I hadn't even gotten that far. Last year there was supposed&amp;nbsp;to be an improved workflow. I don't&amp;nbsp;know what&amp;nbsp;that was exactly, but once I selected a rvt file through&amp;nbsp;the regular import dialog and the list of views wasn't&amp;nbsp;in alphabetical&amp;nbsp;order. I may have as many as a hundred views. But the old workflow worked fine. But the year before, from 2013 to 2014 linking per category was&amp;nbsp;completely&amp;nbsp;botched. I think if brought them in per element ID or something.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'll look at the material/mesh problem you described, but this may not be an issue for me. Max is a stopping point, a very important stopping point. But as long as the material ID's and names are correct it'll work.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And like I said, one of my linked files comes through, the others don't. I'll post an example later&amp;nbsp;if&amp;nbsp;someone wants to look at it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 12:15:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-05-08T12:15:56Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

