<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: New and final Windows Beta pre-release build of Memento available now! in ReMake Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/remake-forum/new-and-final-windows-beta-pre-release-build-of-memento/m-p/6314955#M2120</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN style="line-height: 15px;"&gt;daveontheroad&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="line-height: 15px;"&gt;Well, after testing Memento and comparing with other photogrammetry tools, i can say that Memento is mostly toy, and only one thing made it standing behind competitors is cloud computing.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you need archive quality results, better check other tools like Agisoft Photoscan or Capturing Reality. Photoscan provide amasing control on all levels of photogrammetry, Capturing reality is f**n fast and can eat thousands of images with limited memory.&lt;BR /&gt;Them cost much more than Memento (but comparing with one time payment vs subscription) probably better choice.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Autodesk, sorry for some truth.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And may be you later add manual match-point placement for weak images,&amp;nbsp;postprocessing dence cloud,&amp;nbsp;reimport retopologised mesh with custom UV, and allow generate textures right from photos to this reimported mesh...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 09:03:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-05-09T09:03:47Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

