<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Using &amp;quot;Stock to Leave&amp;quot; instead of cutter compensation in Fusion Manufacture</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/using-quot-stock-to-leave-quot-instead-of-cutter-compensation/m-p/6011476#M7874</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Daily business here.&lt;img id="smileywink" class="emoticon emoticon-smileywink" src="https://forums.autodesk.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-wink.png" alt="Smiley Wink" title="Smiley Wink" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:59:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Laurens-3DTechDraw</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-01-28T12:59:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Using "Stock to Leave" instead of cutter compensation</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/using-quot-stock-to-leave-quot-instead-of-cutter-compensation/m-p/6009928#M7866</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thought I'd share this as I just discovered it yesterday (seems like a no brainer now!). &amp;nbsp;Instead of adjusting for cutter comp in your control/machine you can alternatively use the Stock to Leave function under "Passes" tab. &amp;nbsp;This should give you more control of a single tool over multiple features.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 19:16:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/using-quot-stock-to-leave-quot-instead-of-cutter-compensation/m-p/6009928#M7866</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-27T19:16:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using "Stock to Leave" instead of cutter compensation</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/using-quot-stock-to-leave-quot-instead-of-cutter-compensation/m-p/6010090#M7867</link>
      <description>The only time I think this would be useful would be if you are using the same tool for multiple features that are toleranced unidirectionally in opposite directions.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 20:23:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/using-quot-stock-to-leave-quot-instead-of-cutter-compensation/m-p/6010090#M7867</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steinwerks</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-27T20:23:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using "Stock to Leave" instead of cutter compensation</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/using-quot-stock-to-leave-quot-instead-of-cutter-compensation/m-p/6010155#M7868</link>
      <description>You can also duplicate your tool and just set a different tool diameter offset number for just that operation or feature. That way you can still use the wear comp in your machine to work up to any tolerance you have. I tend to stay away from using "stock to leave" as cutter comp as it starts stacking up and getting confusing when you have multiple dimensions and features you are trying to comp in.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 20:49:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/using-quot-stock-to-leave-quot-instead-of-cutter-compensation/m-p/6010155#M7868</guid>
      <dc:creator>ProteumMachining</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-27T20:49:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using "Stock to Leave" instead of cutter compensation</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/using-quot-stock-to-leave-quot-instead-of-cutter-compensation/m-p/6010980#M7871</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;@atomkinder67 wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;The only time I think this would be useful would be if you are using the same tool for multiple features that aretolerancedunidirectionally in opposite directions.&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I ran a machine with stock to leave only for tolerance compensation for years.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now I use both, because just the cutter comp only on the machine won't work for milling. You need so many different tolerances with the same tool that usually it's a good habit to use the stock to leave boxes to make the toolpath mill at the middle of the tolerance you get. I mean you can't use cutter comp to mill a +/- 0.02 mm and a -0.05 - -0.10 mm tolerance so if you make sure the first tolerance has no stock to leave and the second one has -0.0375(Since usually doubled since on two sides) adjustment on the machine should be correct for both tolerances.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 06:49:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/using-quot-stock-to-leave-quot-instead-of-cutter-compensation/m-p/6010980#M7871</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laurens-3DTechDraw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-28T06:49:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using "Stock to Leave" instead of cutter compensation</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/using-quot-stock-to-leave-quot-instead-of-cutter-compensation/m-p/6011423#M7873</link>
      <description>Laurens: yes, that's what I meant by unidirectional tolerance (the -/- direction). &lt;img class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://forums.autodesk.com/html/@C387DD3F79D38545E682333768222916/emoticons/1f609.png" alt=":winking_face:" title=":winking_face:" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We do almost none of that at my job but every once in a while the engineers try it.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:32:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/using-quot-stock-to-leave-quot-instead-of-cutter-compensation/m-p/6011423#M7873</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steinwerks</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-28T12:32:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using "Stock to Leave" instead of cutter compensation</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/using-quot-stock-to-leave-quot-instead-of-cutter-compensation/m-p/6011476#M7874</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Daily business here.&lt;img id="smileywink" class="emoticon emoticon-smileywink" src="https://forums.autodesk.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-wink.png" alt="Smiley Wink" title="Smiley Wink" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:59:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/using-quot-stock-to-leave-quot-instead-of-cutter-compensation/m-p/6011476#M7874</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laurens-3DTechDraw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-28T12:59:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

