<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: New &amp;quot;Order For Shorter Links&amp;quot; doesn't seem to work as intended? in Fusion Manufacture</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/new-quot-order-for-shorter-links-quot-doesn-t-seem-to-work-as/m-p/13030088#M163338</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;hi Seth, that's weird, I tested this yesterday before and after updating to&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Fusion &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2.0.20256 x86_64&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;combining&amp;nbsp; "Order For Shorter Links" with "use chip thinning" , no change for me, still climb-conventional-climb&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 06:45:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ks-bart</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-09-19T06:45:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>New "Order For Shorter Links" doesn't seem to work as intended?</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/new-quot-order-for-shorter-links-quot-doesn-t-seem-to-work-as/m-p/12784392#M158421</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Just trying out the new "&lt;SPAN&gt;Order For Shorter Links" which is something I've been wanting for ages. But it doesn't seem to work how I would have expected it too. This is a very basic example, but I have a 50mm tool set to do 20mm stepovers. The first 'front' cut is correct, however the second 'back' cut ends up doing pretty much a full width of cut, ignoring the 20mm step over.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I assume it is essentially just generating the old style tool path which works from one side across, but then changing the order of the cuts? Rather than creating a new tool path that should be working from each side in, until it meets in the middle.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have added some screenshots below. Hopefully this makes sense. I was looking forward to this new toolpath, but as it's currently implemented, I can't see it being useful at all, as you seem to have no control over that cut at the back!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="BWENGUK_0-1716194169211.png" style="width: 600px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1364528i33CE16C3BE34BE31/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="BWENGUK_0-1716194169211.png" alt="BWENGUK_0-1716194169211.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="BWENGUK_1-1716194181371.png" style="width: 600px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1364529iDBD9EAB8D9A4CC85/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="BWENGUK_1-1716194181371.png" alt="BWENGUK_1-1716194181371.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="BWENGUK_2-1716194382579.png" style="width: 600px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1364537i6FCCCACC058B1341/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="BWENGUK_2-1716194382579.png" alt="BWENGUK_2-1716194382579.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="BWENGUK_3-1716194450191.png" style="width: 600px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1364540i8D64905FB5D52DAF/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="BWENGUK_3-1716194450191.png" alt="BWENGUK_3-1716194450191.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 08:40:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/new-quot-order-for-shorter-links-quot-doesn-t-seem-to-work-as/m-p/12784392#M158421</guid>
      <dc:creator>BWENGUK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-20T08:40:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New "Order For Shorter Links" doesn't seem to work as intended?</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/new-quot-order-for-shorter-links-quot-doesn-t-seem-to-work-as/m-p/12787556#M158473</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You raise a good point and I think this was overlooked when implementing this feature. I've raised a ticket to improve the behavior; CAM-54081.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for trying it out and sharing your feedback!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 14:50:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/new-quot-order-for-shorter-links-quot-doesn-t-seem-to-work-as/m-p/12787556#M158473</guid>
      <dc:creator>seth.madore</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-21T14:50:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New "Order For Shorter Links" doesn't seem to work as intended?</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/new-quot-order-for-shorter-links-quot-doesn-t-seem-to-work-as/m-p/13027671#M163298</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;hi &lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/6965551"&gt;@seth.madore&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,Another issue is when you select "use chip thinning" togheter with "order for shorter links" the direction "climb milling " is no longer valid!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So with multiple passes, the first pass is climb, second conventional, our mills really don't like this &lt;img class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://forums.autodesk.com/html/@C387DD3F79D38545E682333768222916/emoticons/1f609.png" alt=":winking_face:" title=":winking_face:" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 07:41:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/new-quot-order-for-shorter-links-quot-doesn-t-seem-to-work-as/m-p/13027671#M163298</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ks-bart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-18T07:41:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New "Order For Shorter Links" doesn't seem to work as intended?</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/new-quot-order-for-shorter-links-quot-doesn-t-seem-to-work-as/m-p/13028167#M163305</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you update to the latest Production release (just came out last night) you will find that both matters should be resolved &lt;img class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://forums.autodesk.com/html/@D5D66E11BC96A1C8427F98151D3E9A7A/emoticons/1f642.png" alt=":slightly_smiling_face:" title=":slightly_smiling_face:" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 11:55:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/new-quot-order-for-shorter-links-quot-doesn-t-seem-to-work-as/m-p/13028167#M163305</guid>
      <dc:creator>seth.madore</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-18T11:55:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New "Order For Shorter Links" doesn't seem to work as intended?</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/new-quot-order-for-shorter-links-quot-doesn-t-seem-to-work-as/m-p/13030088#M163338</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hi Seth, that's weird, I tested this yesterday before and after updating to&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Fusion &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2.0.20256 x86_64&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;combining&amp;nbsp; "Order For Shorter Links" with "use chip thinning" , no change for me, still climb-conventional-climb&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 06:45:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/new-quot-order-for-shorter-links-quot-doesn-t-seem-to-work-as/m-p/13030088#M163338</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ks-bart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-19T06:45:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New "Order For Shorter Links" doesn't seem to work as intended?</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/new-quot-order-for-shorter-links-quot-doesn-t-seem-to-work-as/m-p/13030108#M163339</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I just checked this now and its working Fine for me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you share and example .f3d where this isn't working?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 06:54:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/new-quot-order-for-shorter-links-quot-doesn-t-seem-to-work-as/m-p/13030108#M163339</guid>
      <dc:creator>a.laasW8M6T</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-19T06:54:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New "Order For Shorter Links" doesn't seem to work as intended?</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/new-quot-order-for-shorter-links-quot-doesn-t-seem-to-work-as/m-p/13030270#M163342</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've attached a f3d...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the problem only occurs if the mill ends on the other side as where the start point is, so with unequal passes&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 08:16:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/new-quot-order-for-shorter-links-quot-doesn-t-seem-to-work-as/m-p/13030270#M163342</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ks-bart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-19T08:16:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New "Order For Shorter Links" doesn't seem to work as intended?</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/new-quot-order-for-shorter-links-quot-doesn-t-seem-to-work-as/m-p/13030283#M163343</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ah yes I see, and multiple depths&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My test had an even number of stepovers and also no multiple depths.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your example file should be good data for&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/6965551"&gt;@seth.madore&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;to report this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 08:27:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/new-quot-order-for-shorter-links-quot-doesn-t-seem-to-work-as/m-p/13030283#M163343</guid>
      <dc:creator>a.laasW8M6T</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-19T08:27:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New "Order For Shorter Links" doesn't seem to work as intended?</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/new-quot-order-for-shorter-links-quot-doesn-t-seem-to-work-as/m-p/13031225#M163360</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/8904000"&gt;@a.laasW8M6T&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/6554242"&gt;@Ks-bart&lt;/a&gt;,&amp;nbsp;I've opened up CAM-57065 to investigate the issue&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:37:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/new-quot-order-for-shorter-links-quot-doesn-t-seem-to-work-as/m-p/13031225#M163360</guid>
      <dc:creator>seth.madore</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-19T15:37:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

