<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Avoiding &amp;quot;Rapid collision with stock&amp;quot; in Fusion Manufacture</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/avoiding-quot-rapid-collision-with-stock-quot/m-p/12409101#M149634</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Bottom of dune to bottom of stock is 0.25 in!&lt;BR /&gt;Axial Stock to leave in 2D countour2 is 0.5in.&lt;BR /&gt;Tool in Parallel2 has "permission" to go outside model as long as it touches upper surface of model.&lt;BR /&gt;And in bottom left corner, as in other places, 2D Contour is "above" bottom of dune.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Solution 1, Thicker Stock&lt;BR /&gt;Solution 2, Much lower Axial Stock to Leave (like 0.05in)&lt;BR /&gt;Solution 3, set Tool boundary to "Tool center on boundary" together with Little lower Axial Stock to Leave (like 0.24in)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, Vertical Lead-in is only 0.1, so tool go straight down to material left from Pocket, change it to 0.75in&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Nice design btw, I will study it and learn a lot, as I have no experience what so ever of surfaces&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 19:31:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ringarn67</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-11-29T19:31:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Avoiding "Rapid collision with stock"</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/avoiding-quot-rapid-collision-with-stock-quot/m-p/12408951#M149628</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was wondering if someone could take a look at this for me? No matter what I try I cannot avoid getting “Rapid collision with stock errors” in the Simulation when it runs the Parallel toolpath. I've tried everything I know how to do to prevent this, but I'm out of ideas. The only tool path that I can get to work is Geodesic, but this isn't really the toolpath I'd like as it's too complicated and would run for 8 hours.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What am I doing wrong? I’ve been at this for hours and I’m just going around in circles, so a fresh pair of eyes would be much appreciated. Is there a way to prevent these errors when running the Parallel toothpath?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 18:02:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/avoiding-quot-rapid-collision-with-stock-quot/m-p/12408951#M149628</guid>
      <dc:creator>kevinGG4T7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-29T18:02:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Avoiding "Rapid collision with stock"</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/avoiding-quot-rapid-collision-with-stock-quot/m-p/12409101#M149634</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Bottom of dune to bottom of stock is 0.25 in!&lt;BR /&gt;Axial Stock to leave in 2D countour2 is 0.5in.&lt;BR /&gt;Tool in Parallel2 has "permission" to go outside model as long as it touches upper surface of model.&lt;BR /&gt;And in bottom left corner, as in other places, 2D Contour is "above" bottom of dune.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Solution 1, Thicker Stock&lt;BR /&gt;Solution 2, Much lower Axial Stock to Leave (like 0.05in)&lt;BR /&gt;Solution 3, set Tool boundary to "Tool center on boundary" together with Little lower Axial Stock to Leave (like 0.24in)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, Vertical Lead-in is only 0.1, so tool go straight down to material left from Pocket, change it to 0.75in&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Nice design btw, I will study it and learn a lot, as I have no experience what so ever of surfaces&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 19:31:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/avoiding-quot-rapid-collision-with-stock-quot/m-p/12409101#M149634</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ringarn67</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-29T19:31:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Avoiding "Rapid collision with stock"</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/avoiding-quot-rapid-collision-with-stock-quot/m-p/12409135#M149635</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The finishing toolpaths have very little knowledge and control over what stock is there and how to navigate around it. The easiest things to do are:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1: Leave less stock with 2D toolpaths&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2: Increase the Vertical Lead-in radius to a much larger value. In your file, I found that a 1" value would do the job (although smaller would work)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="2023-11-29_14h28_57.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1298863iD4EA111CFB89FB6E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="2023-11-29_14h28_57.png" alt="2023-11-29_14h28_57.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 19:29:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/avoiding-quot-rapid-collision-with-stock-quot/m-p/12409135#M149635</guid>
      <dc:creator>seth.madore</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-29T19:29:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Avoiding "Rapid collision with stock"</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/avoiding-quot-rapid-collision-with-stock-quot/m-p/12409246#M149642</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks so much for taking a look. I'll try those ideas.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the complement about the design. I wish I could take credit for the concept, but&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Kristian Laholm is the genius behind the idea, in his video&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltqmIIbAoVE&amp;amp;t=718s" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltqmIIbAoVE&amp;amp;t=718s&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Cheers&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 20:38:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/avoiding-quot-rapid-collision-with-stock-quot/m-p/12409246#M149642</guid>
      <dc:creator>kevinGG4T7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-29T20:38:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Avoiding "Rapid collision with stock"</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/avoiding-quot-rapid-collision-with-stock-quot/m-p/12409434#M149644</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hope this is helpful to others:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No matter what I did I just could not get the parallel toolpath to stop giving Rapid collision errors. I was tempted to run the file anyway, and hope ofr the best.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, thanks to some suggestions by others, I got it working by switching to a Scallop toolpath and setting the lead-ins to 1".&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'll start the milling in the morning and hopefully all will be well!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 21:57:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/avoiding-quot-rapid-collision-with-stock-quot/m-p/12409434#M149644</guid>
      <dc:creator>kevinGG4T7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-29T21:57:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

