<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Heidenhain 3+2 and 5 axis OP in Fusion Manufacture</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/heidenhain-3-2-and-5-axis-op/m-p/10256973#M102885</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Just notced a bad thing.&lt;BR /&gt;I have a OP with the table tilted B 90 C180&lt;BR /&gt;Next I have a swarf.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;BUT the problem is that it wants to slam down way below my part since it seems that the post doesnt realize that the plane is tilted&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If I add a "dummy" op that forces the table to go to B0 C0 it works, also if I only post the swarf-op (since the program always starts with B0 C0)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any clues what's wrong? I suspect its the post that has some strangeness somewhere&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 14:55:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rhdfmail</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-04-21T14:55:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Heidenhain 3+2 and 5 axis OP</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/heidenhain-3-2-and-5-axis-op/m-p/10256973#M102885</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Just notced a bad thing.&lt;BR /&gt;I have a OP with the table tilted B 90 C180&lt;BR /&gt;Next I have a swarf.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;BUT the problem is that it wants to slam down way below my part since it seems that the post doesnt realize that the plane is tilted&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If I add a "dummy" op that forces the table to go to B0 C0 it works, also if I only post the swarf-op (since the program always starts with B0 C0)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any clues what's wrong? I suspect its the post that has some strangeness somewhere&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 14:55:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/heidenhain-3-2-and-5-axis-op/m-p/10256973#M102885</guid>
      <dc:creator>rhdfmail</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-21T14:55:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Heidenhain 3+2 and 5 axis OP</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/heidenhain-3-2-and-5-axis-op/m-p/10257228#M102895</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/6450094"&gt;@rhdfmail&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Could you share the .cps post file that is causing this issue please?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:33:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/heidenhain-3-2-and-5-axis-op/m-p/10257228#M102895</guid>
      <dc:creator>phil.lewis_bham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-21T16:33:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Heidenhain 3+2 and 5 axis OP</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/heidenhain-3-2-and-5-axis-op/m-p/10259159#M102928</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is the post I use. Its basicly the standard heidenhain-post with some minor modifications.&lt;BR /&gt;There is some other issues with this post, that i suspect has the same source. If I use Plane Spatial instead of Cycle 19 I get the same result.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;BUT. I have used this post for 5-axis ops before with the diference that the previous OP was oriented in B0 C0&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2021 10:36:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/heidenhain-3-2-and-5-axis-op/m-p/10259159#M102928</guid>
      <dc:creator>rhdfmail</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-22T10:36:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Heidenhain 3+2 and 5 axis OP</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/heidenhain-3-2-and-5-axis-op/m-p/10259951#M102947</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for supplying the post.&lt;BR /&gt;This issue could be handled by getting the post to add &lt;STRONG&gt;L B+0 C+0 FMAX M94&lt;/STRONG&gt; after every &lt;STRONG&gt;L M140 MB MAX&lt;/STRONG&gt; to reset the rotary axes after the main Z retract. Please let me know if you would like to add this to the post?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For a more permanent solution I will need to bring this situation to the attention of development.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:02:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/heidenhain-3-2-and-5-axis-op/m-p/10259951#M102947</guid>
      <dc:creator>phil.lewis_bham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-22T15:02:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Heidenhain 3+2 and 5 axis OP</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/heidenhain-3-2-and-5-axis-op/m-p/10264909#M103102</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That is a solution, or rather a hack to make sure I'm not crashing the machine.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It&amp;nbsp; is basicly what I do now with a "dummy" operation to reset the axis just before my 2 swarf-operations. But it is there for ALL operations wich vill be annoying when doing multiple operations on the same side of a part and it resets the axis for all of them (or at least all of them when switching tool)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Odd that nobody else seems to have noticed this rather serious issue&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2021 11:21:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/heidenhain-3-2-and-5-axis-op/m-p/10264909#M103102</guid>
      <dc:creator>rhdfmail</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-24T11:21:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Heidenhain 3+2 and 5 axis OP</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/heidenhain-3-2-and-5-axis-op/m-p/10268107#M103154</link>
      <description>Yes, I would agree the solution offered is not ideal.&lt;BR /&gt;Would it be possible to share the .f3d project file and the output NC file that show this issue please?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2021 08:27:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/heidenhain-3-2-and-5-axis-op/m-p/10268107#M103154</guid>
      <dc:creator>phil.lewis_bham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-26T08:27:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Heidenhain 3+2 and 5 axis OP</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/heidenhain-3-2-and-5-axis-op/m-p/10268164#M103155</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Project-file and generated NC code (saved as txt since the forum didn't like .h files)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2021 08:51:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/heidenhain-3-2-and-5-axis-op/m-p/10268164#M103155</guid>
      <dc:creator>rhdfmail</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-26T08:51:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Heidenhain 3+2 and 5 axis OP</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/heidenhain-3-2-and-5-axis-op/m-p/10274814#M103256</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've been reviewing this issue further and have now logged a ticket to the post processor team.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:27:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/heidenhain-3-2-and-5-axis-op/m-p/10274814#M103256</guid>
      <dc:creator>phil.lewis_bham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-28T11:27:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Heidenhain 3+2 and 5 axis OP</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/heidenhain-3-2-and-5-axis-op/m-p/10355394#M105004</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/6450094"&gt;@rhdfmail&lt;/a&gt; Thanks for your feedback.&lt;BR /&gt;The issue you reported will be fixed with the next update of the heidenhain post processor which will show up on the post library within the next few days.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The main reason for the issue you see is that the postprocessor does not fully support machine configurations.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As a quick fix, you could define your kinematics inside of your postprocessor as explained here:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/how-to-set-up-a-4-5-axis-machine-configuration/td-p/6488176" target="_blank"&gt;https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/how-to-set-up-a-4-5-axis-machine-configuration/td-p/6488176&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;By looking into the machine configuration you defined into fusion, your machine config should then look similar to this:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="general"&gt;  } else if (true) {
    // NOTE: setup your machine here
    // var aAxis = createAxis({coordinate:0, table:true, axis:[1, 0, 0], range:[-120.0001, 120.0001], preference: getProperty("preferTilt")});
    var bAxis = createAxis({coordinate:1, table:true, axis:[0, 1, 0], range:[-120.0001, 45.0001], preference:-1});
    var cAxis = createAxis({coordinate:2, table:true, axis:[0, 0, 1], range:[0, 360], cyclic:true});
    machineConfiguration = new MachineConfiguration(bAxis, cAxis);

    setMachineConfiguration(machineConfiguration);
    optimizeMachineAngles2(0); // using M128 mode&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You will then also notice that the post processor will output real machine angles rather than vectors.&lt;BR /&gt;Please test carefully.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2021 13:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/heidenhain-3-2-and-5-axis-op/m-p/10355394#M105004</guid>
      <dc:creator>AchimN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-01T13:08:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Heidenhain 3+2 and 5 axis OP</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/heidenhain-3-2-and-5-axis-op/m-p/10355433#M105011</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Great news.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I had some suspicion that there was some bug/error with the linkage between machine-config and postprocessor&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I will wait for the next update and do some testing on it&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2021 13:18:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/heidenhain-3-2-and-5-axis-op/m-p/10355433#M105011</guid>
      <dc:creator>rhdfmail</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-01T13:18:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Heidenhain 3+2 and 5 axis OP</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/heidenhain-3-2-and-5-axis-op/m-p/10379914#M105491</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/6450094"&gt;@rhdfmail&lt;/a&gt; FYI, the updated heidenhain post is now available on the post library: &lt;A href="https://cam.autodesk.com/hsmposts?p=heidenhain" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://cam.autodesk.com/hsmposts?p=heidenhain&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please let us know if that solves the problem for you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:38:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/heidenhain-3-2-and-5-axis-op/m-p/10379914#M105491</guid>
      <dc:creator>AchimN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-10T15:38:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

