<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 2D Chamfering Consolidation Vs Evenly Spaced Points in Fusion Manufacture</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/2d-chamfering-consolidation-vs-evenly-spaced-points/m-p/10158545#M100668</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for asking!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would vote 1.&amp;nbsp; A 30% time savings and improved surface quality is something all users can get behind.&amp;nbsp; Two may be advantageous for new users, that would be the primary advantage IMHO.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Shane&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2021 19:22:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>shane.waid</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-03-15T19:22:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>2D Chamfering Consolidation Vs Evenly Spaced Points</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/2d-chamfering-consolidation-vs-evenly-spaced-points/m-p/10157682#M100642</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi forum users,&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;A quick vote on development work you’d rather see done first inside of Fusion’s manufacturing workspace.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Evenly spaced points for all toolpaths – evenly spaced points will allow for evenly spaced point distribution on all 3D finishing toolpaths. Allowing for smoother axis movement on 3, 3+2 and simultaneous 5 axis toolpaths. Recording up to 30% time saving and better surface quality.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Consolidation of 2D chamfering capability – there are currently 3 different ways to machine chamfers with chamfer tools. 2D trace, 2D contour and 2D chamfer. Combining the capabilities into a one stop shop for chamfering, whether the chamfer is modelled or not, and displaying the strengths of each in one strategy.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Vote in the thread and give reasons why, thanks for your time in advance.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV id="tinyMceEditordylan.smith_0" class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2021 14:20:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/2d-chamfering-consolidation-vs-evenly-spaced-points/m-p/10157682#M100642</guid>
      <dc:creator>dylan_smith</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-15T14:20:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2D Chamfering Consolidation Vs Evenly Spaced Points</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/2d-chamfering-consolidation-vs-evenly-spaced-points/m-p/10157762#M100644</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I vote for evenly spaced points.&amp;nbsp; More efficient, higher quality toolpaths should take precedent over consolidating workflows.&amp;nbsp; I would rather have three ways to chamfer and two styles of points output rather&amp;nbsp; than only one each.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2021 14:45:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/2d-chamfering-consolidation-vs-evenly-spaced-points/m-p/10157762#M100644</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanOMFG</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-15T14:45:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2D Chamfering Consolidation Vs Evenly Spaced Points</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/2d-chamfering-consolidation-vs-evenly-spaced-points/m-p/10158545#M100668</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for asking!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would vote 1.&amp;nbsp; A 30% time savings and improved surface quality is something all users can get behind.&amp;nbsp; Two may be advantageous for new users, that would be the primary advantage IMHO.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Shane&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2021 19:22:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manufacture/2d-chamfering-consolidation-vs-evenly-spaced-points/m-p/10158545#M100668</guid>
      <dc:creator>shane.waid</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-15T19:22:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

