<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Keep perpetual licenses in Perpetual License Changes (Read Only)</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/perpetual-license-changes-read/keep-perpetual-licenses/m-p/5693469#M282</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Just post in here to place my dissappointment with this move and 100% support every single word&lt;STRONG&gt; brotherkennyhmusk&lt;/STRONG&gt; wrote in the previous post&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Being completely UNABLE to buy perpetual licenses is definitely NOT a thing any user requested or is happy about. Rental for option yes, but no by enforcement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BTW Im a professional 3ds Max user now for about 15 years, being heavily engaged on the Max Beta, developing tools for 3ds Max and usually take a voluntary promoter position on public community boards, i'm pretty cheesed about all this. I'l stay on my maintainance sub for now ( just happen to be running out ), but definitely will not buy into the rental option ever.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class="lia-message-author-rank lia-component-author-rank-name"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 15:36:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>spacefrog_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-06-25T15:36:05Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

