<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Symbolic vs Boundary lines in Filled &amp;amp; Masking Regions en Revit Ideas</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/symbolic-vs-boundary-lines-in-filled-amp-masking-regions/idi-p/7281575</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Currently filled and masking regions only allow for boundary lines, although they typically aren't referred to that way. Regions only permit a single closed loop of lines to create the boundary. Compare to the way linework functions in shafts, where you can create the boundary but also create symbolic lines that are not part of the closed loop condition. Could be very useful in specific cases to avoid making superfluous groups, when it doesn't make sense to go to the effort of making a family. Since this functionality already exists for shafts, it seems like it should be easy to implement in filled and masking regions.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 15:17:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-08-07T15:17:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Symbolic vs Boundary lines in Filled &amp; Masking Regions</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/symbolic-vs-boundary-lines-in-filled-amp-masking-regions/idi-p/7281575</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Currently filled and masking regions only allow for boundary lines, although they typically aren't referred to that way. Regions only permit a single closed loop of lines to create the boundary. Compare to the way linework functions in shafts, where you can create the boundary but also create symbolic lines that are not part of the closed loop condition. Could be very useful in specific cases to avoid making superfluous groups, when it doesn't make sense to go to the effort of making a family. Since this functionality already exists for shafts, it seems like it should be easy to implement in filled and masking regions.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 15:17:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/symbolic-vs-boundary-lines-in-filled-amp-masking-regions/idi-p/7281575</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-07T15:17:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Symbolic vs Boundary lines in Filled &amp; Masking Regions</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/symbolic-vs-boundary-lines-in-filled-amp-masking-regions/idc-p/7282145#M9939</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sounds like you could just create Detail Component families?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 19:04:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/symbolic-vs-boundary-lines-in-filled-amp-masking-regions/idc-p/7282145#M9939</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-07T19:04:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Symbolic vs Boundary lines in Filled &amp; Masking Regions</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/symbolic-vs-boundary-lines-in-filled-amp-masking-regions/idc-p/7282150#M9940</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;And I would be the first to do so, if the situation warranted it. Not every case warrants a new family, though. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 19:08:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/symbolic-vs-boundary-lines-in-filled-amp-masking-regions/idc-p/7282150#M9940</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-07T19:08:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Symbolic vs Boundary lines in Filled &amp; Masking Regions</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/symbolic-vs-boundary-lines-in-filled-amp-masking-regions/idc-p/7282158#M9941</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you have a god graphic example?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 19:09:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/symbolic-vs-boundary-lines-in-filled-amp-masking-regions/idc-p/7282158#M9941</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-07T19:09:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Symbolic vs Boundary lines in Filled &amp; Masking Regions</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/symbolic-vs-boundary-lines-in-filled-amp-masking-regions/idc-p/7394711#M13895</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I agree! It would be nice to have the "Symbolic Line" in the filled and masked regions. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 15:29:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/symbolic-vs-boundary-lines-in-filled-amp-masking-regions/idc-p/7394711#M13895</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-20T15:29:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

