<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Don't let marketing guys assess ideas en Revit Ideas</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/don-t-let-marketing-guys-assess-ideas/idi-p/6367339</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Marketing guys don't like spending money on enhancing existing functionality - they want new features to attract new customers. Not exactly benificiary for existing users. So let's cut back their weight (getting rid of them alltogether is a bridge too far) in assessing ideas for a product.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2016 20:09:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Simon_Weel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-10-12T20:09:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Don't let marketing guys assess ideas</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/don-t-let-marketing-guys-assess-ideas/idi-p/6367339</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Marketing guys don't like spending money on enhancing existing functionality - they want new features to attract new customers. Not exactly benificiary for existing users. So let's cut back their weight (getting rid of them alltogether is a bridge too far) in assessing ideas for a product.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2016 20:09:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/don-t-let-marketing-guys-assess-ideas/idi-p/6367339</guid>
      <dc:creator>Simon_Weel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-12T20:09:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Don't let marketing guys assess ideas</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/don-t-let-marketing-guys-assess-ideas/idc-p/6386181#M1092</link>
      <description>I believe I understand what you're saying here. In other words, make what you already have work to the best functionality for your current users (who are paying each year for your upgrades) before adding more stuff that will also need work. A rather general idea, but I appreciate the concept. I am voting for this.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 22:24:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/don-t-let-marketing-guys-assess-ideas/idc-p/6386181#M1092</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-15T22:24:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Don't let marketing guys assess ideas</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/don-t-let-marketing-guys-assess-ideas/idc-p/6868506#M5665</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As I have several years of working with Autodesk reseller I must say that I totally agree with you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Each and every time some "big enhancement" or new software or service comes, it is almost every time "big disappointment".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why? Almost every time it is either full of bugs and flaws, either is not finished, either is for "conceptual" something.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pure "marketing only" stuff.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"All show but no go"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:09:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/don-t-let-marketing-guys-assess-ideas/idc-p/6868506#M5665</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mirko.Jurcevic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-10T11:09:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

