<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Disallowed Join at both ends should result in walls with disallowed join at both ends en Revit Ideas</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/disallowed-join-at-both-ends-should-result-in-walls-with/idi-p/13194417</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Sorry for the long idea subject, but I found the current (ok, ok, R2024.2) behaviour a bit weird: When you split a wall that allows no joins on either end, the split will have allowed joins on both edges. The idea would be to change that to reproduce the settings of the wall that is split.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 09:00:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MichaelWolff</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-12-05T09:00:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Disallowed Join at both ends should result in walls with disallowed join at both ends</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/disallowed-join-at-both-ends-should-result-in-walls-with/idi-p/13194417</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sorry for the long idea subject, but I found the current (ok, ok, R2024.2) behaviour a bit weird: When you split a wall that allows no joins on either end, the split will have allowed joins on both edges. The idea would be to change that to reproduce the settings of the wall that is split.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 09:00:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/disallowed-join-at-both-ends-should-result-in-walls-with/idi-p/13194417</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichaelWolff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-05T09:00:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

