<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Eradicate fittings to be changed from routing preferences on models after they are modelled/connected. en Revit Ideas</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/eradicate-fittings-to-be-changed-from-routing-preferences-on/idi-p/12870645</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;This is a long standing issue with MEP - When modelling, Revit routing preferences have the propensity to correct fittings down stream that are already connected - this generally results in remodelling of fittings because Revit want's to reset the fittings.&amp;nbsp; This costs us so much time in correcting.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whilst we are aware of the why's and how's I simply cannot understand that this method is "Revit working as indended"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What's even more annoying is that Revit removed the "self-healing" of MEP objects to avoid worksharing issues.&amp;nbsp; That's acknowledged and respected.&amp;nbsp; So why is changing a fitting upstream any different? i.e If we change a radius bend to a square bend - keep it that way (it's been done for a very good reason), if we draw in a transition, do not reset the transition if we are attaching a shoe on the adjoining duct.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;At the very least give us the option for it to override routing preferences.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I cannot accept that this is an acceptable workflow.&amp;nbsp; It's a pain for all MEP modellers.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:40:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>twellins</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-07-01T05:40:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Eradicate fittings to be changed from routing preferences on models after they are modelled/connected.</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/eradicate-fittings-to-be-changed-from-routing-preferences-on/idi-p/12870645</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is a long standing issue with MEP - When modelling, Revit routing preferences have the propensity to correct fittings down stream that are already connected - this generally results in remodelling of fittings because Revit want's to reset the fittings.&amp;nbsp; This costs us so much time in correcting.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whilst we are aware of the why's and how's I simply cannot understand that this method is "Revit working as indended"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What's even more annoying is that Revit removed the "self-healing" of MEP objects to avoid worksharing issues.&amp;nbsp; That's acknowledged and respected.&amp;nbsp; So why is changing a fitting upstream any different? i.e If we change a radius bend to a square bend - keep it that way (it's been done for a very good reason), if we draw in a transition, do not reset the transition if we are attaching a shoe on the adjoining duct.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;At the very least give us the option for it to override routing preferences.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I cannot accept that this is an acceptable workflow.&amp;nbsp; It's a pain for all MEP modellers.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:40:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/eradicate-fittings-to-be-changed-from-routing-preferences-on/idi-p/12870645</guid>
      <dc:creator>twellins</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-01T05:40:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

