<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Revit needs a real Layer System support for better and sympler visibility control en Revit Ideas</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/revit-needs-a-real-layer-system-support-for-better-and-sympler/idi-p/12120773</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It's hard to work when all lines, annotations, and symbols have the same black color on a white background while editing the project. Autocad's Layers On/Off/Freeze, VP Layers Overrides, and .ctb files have a much better system for controlling what is shown or not. The Revit controls for visibility it's a crazy mess. If something is not showing correctly a had to check more than 15 configurations, from "Category Visibility" to "Object Style". It is just a mess.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2023 20:27:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mr.Borges</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-07-23T20:27:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Revit needs a real Layer System support for better and sympler visibility control</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/revit-needs-a-real-layer-system-support-for-better-and-sympler/idi-p/12120773</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It's hard to work when all lines, annotations, and symbols have the same black color on a white background while editing the project. Autocad's Layers On/Off/Freeze, VP Layers Overrides, and .ctb files have a much better system for controlling what is shown or not. The Revit controls for visibility it's a crazy mess. If something is not showing correctly a had to check more than 15 configurations, from "Category Visibility" to "Object Style". It is just a mess.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2023 20:27:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/revit-needs-a-real-layer-system-support-for-better-and-sympler/idi-p/12120773</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mr.Borges</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-23T20:27:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Revit needs a real Layer System support for better and sympler visibility control</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/revit-needs-a-real-layer-system-support-for-better-and-sympler/idc-p/12125272#M52827</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Just because its different from Autocad doesn't mean its a mess. It might take a short while to learn how to work through filters, templates, overrides, etc, but once you do, it works just fine. Honestly, I greatly prefer Revit's system. Its more predictable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Something that will help a lot is standardizing how you build your models, families, templates, etc so you know right away how everything interacts.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2023 15:17:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/revit-needs-a-real-layer-system-support-for-better-and-sympler/idc-p/12125272#M52827</guid>
      <dc:creator>mhiserZFHXS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-25T15:17:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Revit needs a real Layer System support for better and sympler visibility control</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/revit-needs-a-real-layer-system-support-for-better-and-sympler/idc-p/12567772#M56113</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/10943455"&gt;@mhiserZFHXS&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;If the learning its hard, that's IS a problem. It should be simple. Also we always work with third party files, that uses different ways of controlling what's is visible. We already have a good template and good standards, but it means nothing for received files. When you have thousands of ways of doing the same thing, instead of a few good ways, always leads to bad workflows. I just don't want to spent hours of work just making things showing correctly. This has reached the insane level of having Revit Add-ins specialized on visibility issues. Just insane.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2024 16:56:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/revit-needs-a-real-layer-system-support-for-better-and-sympler/idc-p/12567772#M56113</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mr.Borges</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-18T16:56:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Revit needs a real Layer System support for better and sympler visibility control</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/revit-needs-a-real-layer-system-support-for-better-and-sympler/idc-p/12569187#M56116</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3950284"&gt;@Mr.Borges&lt;/a&gt;Learning is not always easy. Was learning how to be an architect, or whatever field you're in, easy?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Revit is a complicated program for complicated tasks. Sure, there are things that can improved. But it is never going to be a &lt;EM&gt;simple&lt;/EM&gt; program, nor should it be.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 14:17:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/revit-needs-a-real-layer-system-support-for-better-and-sympler/idc-p/12569187#M56116</guid>
      <dc:creator>mhiserZFHXS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-19T14:17:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

