<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Better conformity with BS1192 (UK Users) en Revit Ideas</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idi-p/6333164</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Greater alignment with BS1192 (for UK users) particularly in terms of revision sequences (ability to have P series, D series and C series for different sheets) and also Uniclass 2015 instead of Omniclass would be beneficial as would better support for ~BS1192 sheet naming conventions.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 14:04:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Keith_Wilkinson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-05-18T14:04:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Revisions Revisions Revisions</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/6322252#M16771</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Revision schedule creation that comply with geographic standards..i.e UK (BS1192:2007). Currently I cannot use the OOTB revision schedules and comply with the guidlines set out in BS1192:2007 without a very complicated workaround which virtually removes the automation and greatly increases the chances of errors.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 08:02:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/6322252#M16771</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-12T08:02:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Revisions Revisions Revisions</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/6322813#M16772</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am not familiar with those standards, but i will echo that Revisions and Revision Schedules are seriously lacking in flexibility.&amp;nbsp; We should be able to add shared parameters to Revisions (just like any other category) and creatively filter within Revision schedules to schieve just about anything.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 13:33:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/6322813#M16772</guid>
      <dc:creator>bosborne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-12T13:33:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Better conformity with BS1192 (UK Users)</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idi-p/6333164</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Greater alignment with BS1192 (for UK users) particularly in terms of revision sequences (ability to have P series, D series and C series for different sheets) and also Uniclass 2015 instead of Omniclass would be beneficial as would better support for ~BS1192 sheet naming conventions.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 14:04:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idi-p/6333164</guid>
      <dc:creator>Keith_Wilkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-18T14:04:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better conformity with BS1192 (UK Users)</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/6558648#M2605</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Add to this rotating text in section lines - with BS1192 drawing numbers these can get quite long (too long IMO) and we need to be able to deal with them...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2016 09:08:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/6558648#M2605</guid>
      <dc:creator>Keith_Wilkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-13T09:08:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better conformity with BS1192 (UK Users)</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/7979551#M20371</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As the BS and PAS 1192 standards are going through a process of internationalisation (ISO 19650-1 &amp;amp; 2), this will become relevant globally, so needs a proper fix, not just a localisation or work-around.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 08:10:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/7979551#M20371</guid>
      <dc:creator>carl_hd_collins4TMTF</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-04T08:10:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better conformity with BS1192 (UK Users)</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/8060255#M21043</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This would be very helpful, at the moment you can go through different stages of a project without a work around in place!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i.e: if you use P as a prefix&amp;nbsp;for planning stage, then B for building control stage (Numeric&amp;nbsp; + alphanumeric) you can not add an automated third prefix to make a distinction in between the stages to follow!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2018 15:03:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/8060255#M21043</guid>
      <dc:creator>Atafs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-11T15:03:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better conformity with BS1192 (UK Users)</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/8170211#M21857</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is an essential feature that currently requires individual workarounds. Ideally this would be an instance text field that could be added to the 'Revisions on Sheet' dialogue allowing a&amp;nbsp;user to&amp;nbsp;map&amp;nbsp;a sheet's BS 1192 WIP and published code to the appropriate Revit revision sequence information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Sheet Revisions.PNG" style="width: 583px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/529796i69429EE0F6E891EE/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Sheet Revisions.PNG" alt="Sheet Revisions.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 12:25:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/8170211#M21857</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-01T12:25:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better conformity with BS1192 (UK Users)</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/8299582#M23088</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;100% agreed with Carl above. We can't use Revit's revision system in line with BS1192 because of&amp;nbsp;Revit's inflexibility.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 14:05:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/8299582#M23088</guid>
      <dc:creator>aloxford28</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-28T14:05:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better conformity with BS1192 (UK Users)</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/8576997#M25160</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;ISO 19650 has now been released showing that BS1192 was a great standard to works towards. It would be great if Revit could provide more flexibility for Revision Codes and Status Codes.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2019 14:23:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/8576997#M25160</guid>
      <dc:creator>kevincoffey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-06T14:23:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better conformity with BS1192 (UK Users)</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/8577007#M25161</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Agreed Kevin. This seems to be taking a long time.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2019 14:25:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/8577007#M25161</guid>
      <dc:creator>aloxford28</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-06T14:25:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better conformity with BS1192 (UK Users)</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/8577035#M25162</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Alox, the workaround I have found so far is to manually input into Alphanumeric - P01, P02, P03, P04 - and set revisions by sheet. This doesn't solve anything related to internal versioning (P01.01. P01.02) but can be used for the initial sharing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In addition, moving to 'published' (C01, C02, C03) requires another workaround. You could possibly use a parameter on the titlesheet to move between P issues and C issues but then you have to be careful about regulating the revisions on the sheet. All the above is a nightmare for document controlling!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I think the BS ISO document does a good job of explaining how the process works and I would hope it wouldn't be too much trouble for Revit to implement as it is only text and nothing relating to graphics.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2019 14:31:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/8577035#M25162</guid>
      <dc:creator>kevincoffey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-06T14:31:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better conformity with BS1192 (UK Users)</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/8579355#M25213</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I agree with Kevin's last point about the implementation not being too difficult and with the standards now a full international one, this is no longer a localisation for Revit, but a global requirement now.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In regards to the minor revision, I'm not sure this really works for Revit models at all. To implement properly, each time a change is saved back to the central model, by rights the minor revision would increment. Having ten modelers saving ten times a day each, it would go from 00 to 99 within a working day, and for what gain? If you are uploading to WIP on a scheduled basis, that could be a different story, but only the authoring company sees the WIP version, so how is it helping them? I tend to ignore it for models.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 10:52:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/8579355#M25213</guid>
      <dc:creator>carl_hd_collins4TMTF</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-07T10:52:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better conformity with BS1192 (UK Users)</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/9010964#M29029</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;To quote from the BS1192:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Formal revisions should be numbered sequentially, marking the revision as either preliminary (P0&lt;I&gt;n&lt;/I&gt;) or contractual (C0&lt;I&gt;n&lt;/I&gt;).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marking the revision does not reset or start a new sequence.&amp;nbsp; Revit happily adds numeric sequences.&amp;nbsp; The only work around is re-using the Issued parameters for 'Suitability' and Revision Mark.&amp;nbsp; This is also how any document management system would work.&amp;nbsp; The versioning would be independent from any meta data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Sheet schedule" style="width: 433px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/674812i6C429B8EFA9F4D7C/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Annotation 2019-09-06 174629.jpg" alt="Sheet schedule" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;Sheet schedule&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Revision dialog" style="width: 524px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/674815iB38BCD18BE6BC344/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Annotation 2019-09-06 174713.jpg" alt="Revision dialog" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;Revision dialog&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As for WIP revisions.&amp;nbsp; They should never be issued so Revit need not support this.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 16:52:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/9010964#M29029</guid>
      <dc:creator>BarrieSharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-06T16:52:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better conformity with BS1192 (UK Users)</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/10221637#M37893</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm pleased to say that as of Revit 2022 this can now be marked as implemented.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 12:32:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/10221637#M37893</guid>
      <dc:creator>Keith_Wilkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-08T12:32:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better conformity with BS1192 (UK Users)</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/10221743#M37895</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Great news. Thanks, Keith!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 13:00:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/10221743#M37895</guid>
      <dc:creator>kevincoffey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-08T13:00:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better conformity with BS1192 (UK Users) - Status changed to: Implemented</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/10222718#M37912</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are pleased to say that this has been implemented in Revit 2022.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-The Factory&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 17:37:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/10222718#M37912</guid>
      <dc:creator>kimberly_fuhrman-jones</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-08T17:37:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better conformity with BS1192 (UK Users) - Status changed to: Gathering Support</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/10750999#M41765</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2021 15:28:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/10750999#M41765</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tarek_K</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-11T15:28:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better conformity with BS1192 (UK Users) - Status changed to: Implemented</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/10771722#M42359</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2021 10:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/better-conformity-with-bs1192-uk-users/idc-p/10771722#M42359</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tarek_K</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-21T10:52:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

