<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Renaming workset terminology en Revit Ideas</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/renaming-workset-terminology/idi-p/6662039</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It would be fantastic to have the terminology around worksets updated to something that makes a bit more sense to new users :&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Open and Closed make fantastic sense, keep these, no change. But trying to explain to new users that Uneditable is actually good, and doesn't mean uneditable (unmodifiable or modelable).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Anyone has a good way of explaining that also just let me know!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 20:27:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>KentBurns</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-02-22T20:27:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Renaming workset terminology</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/renaming-workset-terminology/idi-p/6662039</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It would be fantastic to have the terminology around worksets updated to something that makes a bit more sense to new users :&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Open and Closed make fantastic sense, keep these, no change. But trying to explain to new users that Uneditable is actually good, and doesn't mean uneditable (unmodifiable or modelable).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Anyone has a good way of explaining that also just let me know!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 20:27:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/renaming-workset-terminology/idi-p/6662039</guid>
      <dc:creator>KentBurns</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-22T20:27:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks for taking the time to submit your idea. Unfortuna...</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/renaming-workset-terminology/idc-p/7346371#M10944</link>
      <description>Thanks for taking the time to submit your idea. Unfortunately, this idea did not get the support of the community over the last 6 months and as such we will not be pursuing it at this time. Please feel free to rework (titles and clear descriptions are really important) and resubmit this one down the road.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 19:20:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/renaming-workset-terminology/idc-p/7346371#M10944</guid>
      <dc:creator>sasha.crotty</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-01T19:20:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Renaming workset terminology - Status changed to: Archived</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/renaming-workset-terminology/idc-p/7346365#M10938</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 19:20:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/renaming-workset-terminology/idc-p/7346365#M10938</guid>
      <dc:creator>sasha.crotty</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-01T19:20:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

