<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Accepting an imported georefrenced 3D polyline as the path for Loft/Blend,sweep en Revit Ideas</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/accepting-an-imported-georefrenced-3d-polyline-as-the-path-for/idi-p/9565391</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;One of the most confusing things regarding using Revit as a tool for modeling infrastructure or civil elements, such as bridges, box culverts, etc, is the limitation that you can not import easily a georeferenced &lt;STRONG&gt;3D polyline and use it directly as a path for the model-in-place family&lt;/STRONG&gt;. You have to work with a lot of weird and inaccurate workarounds and you do not succeed most of the times. You can not define in Revit a family or better yet a model-in-place family that follows a path &lt;STRONG&gt;without twisting/rotating&lt;/STRONG&gt; or respecting two or more &lt;STRONG&gt;line targets&lt;/STRONG&gt;. it simply does not let your blend profiles stay &lt;STRONG&gt;perpendicular on the path&lt;/STRONG&gt; or guidelines/targets of the profile. another problem is a big one that in most confusing ways the parameters in the sweep or blended profiles do not update, and that's results in a lot of frustrations and losing several workhours and restarting whole the process because simply one tiny parameter did not update and the family do not join to other elements.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 19:12:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-02-15T19:12:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Accepting an imported georefrenced 3D polyline as the path for Loft/Blend,sweep</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/accepting-an-imported-georefrenced-3d-polyline-as-the-path-for/idi-p/9565391</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;One of the most confusing things regarding using Revit as a tool for modeling infrastructure or civil elements, such as bridges, box culverts, etc, is the limitation that you can not import easily a georeferenced &lt;STRONG&gt;3D polyline and use it directly as a path for the model-in-place family&lt;/STRONG&gt;. You have to work with a lot of weird and inaccurate workarounds and you do not succeed most of the times. You can not define in Revit a family or better yet a model-in-place family that follows a path &lt;STRONG&gt;without twisting/rotating&lt;/STRONG&gt; or respecting two or more &lt;STRONG&gt;line targets&lt;/STRONG&gt;. it simply does not let your blend profiles stay &lt;STRONG&gt;perpendicular on the path&lt;/STRONG&gt; or guidelines/targets of the profile. another problem is a big one that in most confusing ways the parameters in the sweep or blended profiles do not update, and that's results in a lot of frustrations and losing several workhours and restarting whole the process because simply one tiny parameter did not update and the family do not join to other elements.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 19:12:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/accepting-an-imported-georefrenced-3d-polyline-as-the-path-for/idi-p/9565391</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-15T19:12:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

