<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea &amp;quot;Hide rebar&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Tag rebar&amp;quot; in the same command en Revit Ideas</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/quot-hide-rebar-quot-and-quot-tag-rebar-quot-in-the-same-command/idi-p/9331153</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We need "Hide rebar" and "Tag rebar" in the same command. Like Sofistik does. It's the same workflow. One without the other makes no sense. And should also have an option to replace shown rebar with its bending detail. That, if Revit would have such detailing, of course.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:42:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ipselute</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-20T15:42:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>"Hide rebar" and "Tag rebar" in the same command</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/quot-hide-rebar-quot-and-quot-tag-rebar-quot-in-the-same-command/idi-p/9331153</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We need "Hide rebar" and "Tag rebar" in the same command. Like Sofistik does. It's the same workflow. One without the other makes no sense. And should also have an option to replace shown rebar with its bending detail. That, if Revit would have such detailing, of course.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:42:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/quot-hide-rebar-quot-and-quot-tag-rebar-quot-in-the-same-command/idi-p/9331153</guid>
      <dc:creator>ipselute</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-20T15:42:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

