<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea improve 3d snapping en Revit Ideas</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/improve-3d-snapping/idi-p/8167836</link>
    <description>why autodesk doesn't improve 3d snapping system to allow:&lt;BR /&gt;copy, move&lt;BR /&gt;sketch or&lt;BR /&gt;without having to define a workplane everytime&lt;BR /&gt;using inference system like in formit or sketchup will be perfect, they use a snap options like:&lt;BR /&gt;perpendicular to...&lt;BR /&gt;parallel to...&lt;BR /&gt;and they are using a color for every type of snap&lt;BR /&gt;blue for z axis&lt;BR /&gt;red for x axis&lt;BR /&gt;green for y axis&lt;BR /&gt;pink for parallel or perpendicular.&lt;BR /&gt;all this system is adapted to snap on objects and workplanes thar are closest to the view angles.&lt;BR /&gt;these options will be really great for working on families modelisation</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 14:48:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>yassinemestiri</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-07-31T14:48:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>improve 3d snapping</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/improve-3d-snapping/idi-p/8167836</link>
      <description>why autodesk doesn't improve 3d snapping system to allow:&lt;BR /&gt;copy, move&lt;BR /&gt;sketch or&lt;BR /&gt;without having to define a workplane everytime&lt;BR /&gt;using inference system like in formit or sketchup will be perfect, they use a snap options like:&lt;BR /&gt;perpendicular to...&lt;BR /&gt;parallel to...&lt;BR /&gt;and they are using a color for every type of snap&lt;BR /&gt;blue for z axis&lt;BR /&gt;red for x axis&lt;BR /&gt;green for y axis&lt;BR /&gt;pink for parallel or perpendicular.&lt;BR /&gt;all this system is adapted to snap on objects and workplanes thar are closest to the view angles.&lt;BR /&gt;these options will be really great for working on families modelisation</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 14:48:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/improve-3d-snapping/idi-p/8167836</guid>
      <dc:creator>yassinemestiri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-31T14:48:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: improve 3d snapping</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/improve-3d-snapping/idc-p/8172689#M21877</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You have nailed the problem with laser precision! I'm very much used with the Autocad snapping system, very precise, very accurate. If Revit would have half of the Autocad snapping precision i would be the happiest person on Earth.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Creating parameters using offsets it's not always intuitive. Especially when having to use existing underlays and create parameters between existing fixed points. It's just ridiculous to measure a distance between existing topo points and then creating a parameter by typing weird values. Snapping those points precisely would help a lot.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 08:56:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/improve-3d-snapping/idc-p/8172689#M21877</guid>
      <dc:creator>ipselute</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-02T08:56:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: improve 3d snapping</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/improve-3d-snapping/idc-p/8238928#M22498</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;added to this proposition... autodesk can also add the option of showing a virtual plane on the 3D view to the sections.. and why not snapping on this plane.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 20:11:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/improve-3d-snapping/idc-p/8238928#M22498</guid>
      <dc:creator>yassinemestiri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-31T20:11:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: improve 3d snapping</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/improve-3d-snapping/idc-p/9669793#M33203</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Work in 3D with revit is very frustrating. Sometimes is very hard to move, array or copy things using 3d view. Snaps do not works very well, sometimes works, sometimes does not detect elements. Could you work to improve this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2020 13:09:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/improve-3d-snapping/idc-p/9669793#M33203</guid>
      <dc:creator>rbarbosa8DQGJ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-03T13:09:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: improve 3d snapping</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/improve-3d-snapping/idc-p/9669805#M33205</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;WTF Autodesk! For two years this Idea is asking to improve snaps and YOU do nothing? Improve snaps! Improve snaps! Is that the way you want to make Revit the main BIM software of all? In order to bring autocad users, you need to make Revit platform more intuitive. You can copy the way of working in 3d model of Autocad, you have my permision, after all, the copyrights is yours!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2020 13:16:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/improve-3d-snapping/idc-p/9669805#M33205</guid>
      <dc:creator>rbarbosa8DQGJ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-03T13:16:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: improve 3d snapping</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/improve-3d-snapping/idc-p/9670098#M33213</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/8172023"&gt;@rbarbosa8DQGJ&lt;/a&gt;Chill out a bit. Be more zen. I know 10-year old ideas that haven't been implemented yet. BIM software is not easy to implement. It's like playing with nukes. Fixing one problem may cause other 10 (bigger) problems. I've seen many CAD and BIM softwares. I'm still seeking to find a perfect one. For all softwares i've seen and used, Revit is still the most advanced and most multi-discipline integrated i've encountered. That's why i'm stubbornly (still) using it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The (real) problem is that Autodesk doesn't understand specific workflows for specific disciplines. Autocad was so successful because it had(has) separate commands and editions for different specialties. Revit is kinda all-in-one shaorma and it's kinda difficult for the customer to find only the commands one really needs.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2020 15:28:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/improve-3d-snapping/idc-p/9670098#M33213</guid>
      <dc:creator>ipselute</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-03T15:28:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

