<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea More rebar distribution types en Revit Ideas</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idi-p/7631434</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Standard distribution of&amp;nbsp;rebar&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;a constant spacing only.&amp;nbsp;It is inconvenient. You need to add two more layout options:&amp;nbsp;"With additional spacing" and "Formula".&amp;nbsp;These ideas have already been published earlier, on other resources: &lt;A href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-bim-russkiy/raspredelenie-armatury-quot-s-dobornym-shagom-quot/m-p/5341259#M11859" target="_blank"&gt;1&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;A href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-bim-russkiy/formuly-raspredeleniya-dlya-naborov-armaturnyh-sterzhney/td-p/5039780" target="_blank"&gt;2&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="rebar spacing1.png" style="width: 235px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/440233i56F61F07FA75398E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="rebar spacing1.png" alt="rebar spacing1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1.&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;"With additional spacing"&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"Maximum spacing" layout is good because it automatically places the reinforcement set on the entire structure, and the length of the rebar set can be adjusted with "Handles".&amp;nbsp;But the spacing&amp;nbsp;turns out to be inaccurate!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="rebar spacing2.png" style="width: 483px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/440237i7A0E690FB41116FB/image-dimensions/483x152?v=v2" width="483" height="152" role="button" title="rebar spacing2.png" alt="rebar spacing2.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"Number with spacing" not convenient too:&amp;nbsp;the quantity must be specified manually.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In practice reinforcing bars will be mounted as follows:&amp;nbsp;several rebars with spacing "200", and the&amp;nbsp;last&amp;nbsp;with a reduced, "additional" step:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="rebar spacing3.png" style="width: 294px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/440241iADF0B1C8C7A0FA4C/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="rebar spacing3.png" alt="rebar spacing3.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now I need to put the bars first "Number with spacing", and separately put one rebar at a distance of 140.&amp;nbsp;It's horrible and makes me cry.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We need new rebar distribution layout &lt;STRONG&gt;"Fixed spacing with additional rebar".&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The properties should be able to switch the "Additional spacing" - "At the beginning" or "At the end".&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"Rebar presentation - Show first and last"&amp;nbsp;must show the first and last in the zone with a constant interval, "Multi-rebar annotation"&amp;nbsp;should work the same:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="rebar spacing4.png" style="width: 572px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/440253iB603DEA3DF81ADC2/image-dimensions/572x197?v=v2" width="572" height="197" role="button" title="rebar spacing4.png" alt="rebar spacing4.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"Rebar by area" and "Rebar by path"&amp;nbsp;must have the same setting.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. &lt;STRONG&gt;"By formula"&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When reinforcing&amp;nbsp;columns and beams, it usually requires the installation of transverse rods with a&amp;nbsp;variable step - a step smaller at the end, more - in the middle:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="2009_09_16_01.jpg" style="width: 235px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/440257i3D9CE14319EC3B3E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="2009_09_16_01.jpg" alt="2009_09_16_01.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now I have to use 3 different sets of rods. This is inconvenient, especially when editing - three times as much work.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The method&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;"By formula "&lt;/SPAN&gt; should work like this:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="rebar spacing5.png" style="width: 705px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/440258iD2549DDDA590FD88/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="rebar spacing5.png" alt="rebar spacing5.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"Rebar presentation" and "Multi-rebar annotation"&amp;nbsp;should work in the same way as in method 1.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For "Rebar by area" and "Rebar by path" this method is not required.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 10:05:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Extraneous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-12-18T10:05:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>More rebar distribution types</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idi-p/7631434</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Standard distribution of&amp;nbsp;rebar&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;a constant spacing only.&amp;nbsp;It is inconvenient. You need to add two more layout options:&amp;nbsp;"With additional spacing" and "Formula".&amp;nbsp;These ideas have already been published earlier, on other resources: &lt;A href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-bim-russkiy/raspredelenie-armatury-quot-s-dobornym-shagom-quot/m-p/5341259#M11859" target="_blank"&gt;1&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;A href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-bim-russkiy/formuly-raspredeleniya-dlya-naborov-armaturnyh-sterzhney/td-p/5039780" target="_blank"&gt;2&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="rebar spacing1.png" style="width: 235px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/440233i56F61F07FA75398E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="rebar spacing1.png" alt="rebar spacing1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1.&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;"With additional spacing"&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"Maximum spacing" layout is good because it automatically places the reinforcement set on the entire structure, and the length of the rebar set can be adjusted with "Handles".&amp;nbsp;But the spacing&amp;nbsp;turns out to be inaccurate!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="rebar spacing2.png" style="width: 483px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/440237i7A0E690FB41116FB/image-dimensions/483x152?v=v2" width="483" height="152" role="button" title="rebar spacing2.png" alt="rebar spacing2.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"Number with spacing" not convenient too:&amp;nbsp;the quantity must be specified manually.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In practice reinforcing bars will be mounted as follows:&amp;nbsp;several rebars with spacing "200", and the&amp;nbsp;last&amp;nbsp;with a reduced, "additional" step:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="rebar spacing3.png" style="width: 294px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/440241iADF0B1C8C7A0FA4C/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="rebar spacing3.png" alt="rebar spacing3.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now I need to put the bars first "Number with spacing", and separately put one rebar at a distance of 140.&amp;nbsp;It's horrible and makes me cry.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We need new rebar distribution layout &lt;STRONG&gt;"Fixed spacing with additional rebar".&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The properties should be able to switch the "Additional spacing" - "At the beginning" or "At the end".&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"Rebar presentation - Show first and last"&amp;nbsp;must show the first and last in the zone with a constant interval, "Multi-rebar annotation"&amp;nbsp;should work the same:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="rebar spacing4.png" style="width: 572px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/440253iB603DEA3DF81ADC2/image-dimensions/572x197?v=v2" width="572" height="197" role="button" title="rebar spacing4.png" alt="rebar spacing4.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"Rebar by area" and "Rebar by path"&amp;nbsp;must have the same setting.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. &lt;STRONG&gt;"By formula"&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When reinforcing&amp;nbsp;columns and beams, it usually requires the installation of transverse rods with a&amp;nbsp;variable step - a step smaller at the end, more - in the middle:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="2009_09_16_01.jpg" style="width: 235px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/440257i3D9CE14319EC3B3E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="2009_09_16_01.jpg" alt="2009_09_16_01.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now I have to use 3 different sets of rods. This is inconvenient, especially when editing - three times as much work.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The method&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;"By formula "&lt;/SPAN&gt; should work like this:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="rebar spacing5.png" style="width: 705px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/440258iD2549DDDA590FD88/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="rebar spacing5.png" alt="rebar spacing5.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"Rebar presentation" and "Multi-rebar annotation"&amp;nbsp;should work in the same way as in method 1.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For "Rebar by area" and "Rebar by path" this method is not required.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 10:05:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idi-p/7631434</guid>
      <dc:creator>Extraneous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-18T10:05:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: More rebar distribution types</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/8123760#M21499</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Да ! Да ! Да ! YES ! YES ! YOU NEED IT&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 16:14:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/8123760#M21499</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-11T16:14:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: More rebar distribution types</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/8265072#M22790</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm agree, variable rebar distribution is very hard to do, we need more tools for a better productivity !&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:41:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/8265072#M22790</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mikael_QUIJADA</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-13T08:41:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: More rebar distribution types</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/8270297#M22843</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;for now the only solution in Revit to create variable rebar distribution is to copy this rebar on different views -:)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2018 16:13:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/8270297#M22843</guid>
      <dc:creator>pavlo_ukraine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-15T16:13:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: More rebar distribution types</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/8288088#M22998</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This wish looks&amp;nbsp;desirable on the first glance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, what should REVIT do, in case the Overall length of the Distribution changes in the future? Difficult answer, or?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And: On Site I have seen a lot of columns where the Formula Distribution can help. The additional spacing so something I have not seen on site.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 13:29:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/8288088#M22998</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-24T13:29:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: More rebar distribution types</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/8290885#M23011</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;First, if "overlap length" how Revit deal with (Number with spacing) I think it is basically the same with variable distribution of bars. That is why we are engineers to control it. Second, The additional spacing we always use, because in case the length of bar is 3500 and spacing on it 17bars*200(spacing)+100(additional spacing)=3500mm. Both ideas would increace the speed of reinforcment design. Above all I think we can use formula for additional spacing. In Revit it would be the same bottom. Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:12:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/8290885#M23011</guid>
      <dc:creator>pavlo_ukraine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-25T13:12:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: More rebar distribution types</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/8318879#M23217</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This Idea may work like this&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbkJtO5KCHY&amp;amp;t=3s" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbkJtO5KCHY&amp;amp;t=3s&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 07:18:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/8318879#M23217</guid>
      <dc:creator>pavlo_ukraine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-08T07:18:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: More rebar distribution types</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/8332986#M23327</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Pavlo,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;obviously your command creates several rebar sets. which can also be achieved by creating one set with REVIT, the command "Split Rebar Set" or "Isolate" from RCD and modifying the layout rules.&amp;nbsp;All Methods share, that it is not defined what will happen, in case someone changes the length of the column. This is, why we decided not to support this functionality more than we already do. Benefit is too less compared to work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thomas Fink&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SOFiSTiK AG&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2018 10:42:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/8332986#M23327</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-14T10:42:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: More rebar distribution types</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/8333256#M23329</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear, Thomas Fink.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From my point of view and experience the benefits of this feature are too high. I do not need use this functionality for all length of column.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example in my previous project I had 35 types of reinforced concrete columns out of 40. I used peikko PCs corbel system to support beams. If you open this catalog you will find there on the pages 29, 30, 31, 33, 34 the "Annex A-Supplementary reinforcement". It was realy hard to copy stirraps along the column because some of them just axidently change the restriction. I always place them like it have to be ("Edit Constraince" or "Edit Sketch" ) after copying.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It would be much easier to implement my reinforcment job in case I have in Revit&amp;nbsp; more rebar destributing types (as here it is said "by formula").&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2018 18:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/8333256#M23329</guid>
      <dc:creator>pavlo_ukraine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-14T18:10:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: More rebar distribution types</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/8521121#M24719</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;yes, sure. The Allplan and Tekla have these feature but our company bought Revit licences for all company and update every year the version of Revit. I want to see it in Revit!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:34:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/8521121#M24719</guid>
      <dc:creator>pavlo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-14T17:34:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: More rebar distribution types</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/10097569#M36705</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hope this idea comes to life. most of the projects we work upon need this option to control varied rebar distances within one set. This also affect the drawing presentation of rebars in plan views.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 22:54:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/10097569#M36705</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-19T22:54:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: More rebar distribution types</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/10230599#M38026</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sounds fantastically, and it seems that it's suprise for Autodesk too, but in Revit 2022 a workaround for this problem have been appeared. Now we can move bars in set separately and are able to implement this "variable rebar interval".&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I think you can change the status of the idea to "Implemented"!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2021 08:28:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/10230599#M38026</guid>
      <dc:creator>Extraneous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-12T08:28:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: More rebar distribution types</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/10230637#M38027</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Ok there is an improvement with the R2022, but variable spacement are long to achieve and you can't copy a bar (only move or delete)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Here an example of what I would like to have on Revit :&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="forum.gif" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/905242iA1F2FE02750A7A8C/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="forum.gif" alt="forum.gif" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2021 08:43:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/10230637#M38027</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mikael_QUIJADA</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-12T08:43:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: More rebar distribution types</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/11199339#M45132</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;yes we need multi spacing rebar set&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2022 11:25:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/11199339#M45132</guid>
      <dc:creator>WALIDGIO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-28T11:25:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: More rebar distribution types</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/12302546#M54056</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your important idea&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1127414"&gt;@Extraneous&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FIRST DAY I started using Revit as a structural designer and drafter in 2018, I literally wondered why this super critical feature is not available in Revit 2018. Closer spacing of stirrups in critical zones of beams and columns, is mandatory by many concrete codes all over the world. Doing this task with current tools in Revit, is frustrating.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know this feature is added to Revit Road Map. So I'm hopeful to have it in the next version.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I strongly suggest to make this feature smart. By saying smart, I mean Revit should use Artificial Intelligence to check each column based on code (like ACI 318-19) and suggest a number for spacing and L0 length (L0 is defined in below picture).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And, I also hope for a change in Autodesk policy to speed up Revit improvements and to pay attention to industry needs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="farzanbayat74_0-1697145713382.png" style="width: 600px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1278642i5BEC482A3B6B7371/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="farzanbayat74_0-1697145713382.png" alt="farzanbayat74_0-1697145713382.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 21:27:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/12302546#M54056</guid>
      <dc:creator>farzanbayat74</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-12T21:27:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: More rebar distribution types</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/13012518#M59584</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I can't believe this still isnt implemented.......&lt;BR /&gt;The original write up shows exactly why we need this, nobody is going to space rebar 285 mm apart when the engineer said to do 300mm spacing.......&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="maurijnE_0-1726001090344.png" style="width: 600px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1407656i4F47BC72F09123AA/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="maurijnE_0-1726001090344.png" alt="maurijnE_0-1726001090344.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;HOW????&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 20:44:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/more-rebar-distribution-types/idc-p/13012518#M59584</guid>
      <dc:creator>maurijnE</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-10T20:44:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

