<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Automated View Naming en Revit Ideas</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/automated-view-naming/idi-p/7545248</link>
    <description>View naming should nor be left to manual edits. Make it restricted to being concatenated from multiple sections that start with level, view type, use, user initials, etc. and these views also automatically place themselves into the right locations in the project browser.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 08:28:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Basam.Yousif</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-15T08:28:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Automated View Naming</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/automated-view-naming/idi-p/7545248</link>
      <description>View naming should nor be left to manual edits. Make it restricted to being concatenated from multiple sections that start with level, view type, use, user initials, etc. and these views also automatically place themselves into the right locations in the project browser.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 08:28:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/automated-view-naming/idi-p/7545248</guid>
      <dc:creator>Basam.Yousif</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-15T08:28:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Automated View Naming</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/automated-view-naming/idc-p/13088065#M60157</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I was going to ask for something that ressemble your idea so I'll write my idea here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not a big fan to automate the names as stated above.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But if it's an optionnal feature : why not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My Idea was to at least offer a prefix, linked to the view template.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But please ensure that they are used to help categorize views and that they are not taken into account in the view name.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example, in my office we use views to &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;U&gt;pr&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;int, others to &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;U&gt;co&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;ordonate and others to &lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;wo&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;rk.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have different view templates for each kind of view.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If we could automate the name of the view to always use "PR_" or "CO_" or "WO_" as a prefix, when they are linked to a view template, it would make life easier.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This would allow us to quickly see if the correct template is used. Views would be sorted well if the view template change, etc.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 12:38:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/automated-view-naming/idc-p/13088065#M60157</guid>
      <dc:creator>Evalucia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-16T12:38:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

