Wiretap

Reply
Valued Contributor
88 Posts
0 Kudos
Registered: ‎06-26-2003
Post 1 of 6

Clip listing order.

2727 Views, 5 Replies
04-01-2009 04:35 PM
Still tracking this down, but here is where I stand now.

Prior to 2009 Ext 1 wiretap was providing the clip list of a particular reel in the same order as it was arranged on the "Stone". Now in 2009 Ext1 the list order is alphabetical. Any info regarding this?

Alan
Valued Contributor
51 Posts
0 Kudos
Registered: ‎11-17-2006
Post 2 of 6

Re: Clip listing order.

04-01-2009 06:17 PM in reply to: alatteri
Yes, all Wiretap nodes are automatically sorted by display name. In your case, you can probably re-create the order of clips using the creation date metadata, which probably reflects the order in the clip library or reel.
Valued Contributor
88 Posts
0 Kudos
Registered: ‎06-26-2003
Post 3 of 6

Re: Clip listing order.

04-01-2009 06:22 PM in reply to: alatteri
Did this change with 2009 Ext 1? Creation date in no way reflects how a reel is organized. It might be assumed, but definitely not a guarantee and should not be counted on in my opinion. It worked so automagically perfect before. Edited by: alatteri on Apr 1, 2009 6:24 PM
Valued Contributor
51 Posts
0 Kudos
Registered: ‎11-17-2006
Post 4 of 6

Re: Clip listing order.

04-01-2009 06:28 PM in reply to: alatteri
Yes, this changed in the extension (and in a 2009 service pack if memory serves). It was done to resolve a couple of issues reported by clients, including consistency between WT-enabled products. I agree with you that creation date is not necessarily representative of how a reel is organized. This order was not really promised as part of the SDK contract ... especially since it could not be set. Perhaps we need a sort order field in the node metadata...
Valued Contributor
88 Posts
0 Kudos
Registered: ‎06-26-2003
Post 5 of 6

Re: Clip listing order.

04-01-2009 06:52 PM in reply to: alatteri
OK. I consider this a regression, but thanks for the clarification. A client was pretty upset at me, now I can have them be upset at Autodesk. :smileyhappy:
Valued Contributor
51 Posts
0 Kudos
Registered: ‎11-17-2006
Post 6 of 6

Re: Clip listing order.

04-01-2009 06:55 PM in reply to: alatteri
Fair enough. Trying to guarantee backward compatibility through a contractual API is not always easy, and sometimes we miss on 'essential' undocumented features of the client and server. Have the customer call support if they deem it critical.

Dan
Post to the Community

Have questions about Autodesk products? Ask the community.

New Post
Announcements
Are you interested in helping shape the future of the Autodesk Community? To participate in this brief usability study, please click here. Your time and input is greatly appreciated!