My 2 cents: It depends. I've found that certain objects are created many
times faster via (command) than (entmake). As a purist though, I tend to
favor (entmake) because of the ability to force things like layer, linetype,
text height, obliquing angle, bulge (that's big one), and such. Doing a
"Find" on my collection of routines just now resulted in a propensity of the
use of (command) to insert blocks, then several to just (command "_.LIST")
objects to keep them highlighted while a user might zoom/pan.
Heed well the admonitions of mixing plain AutoLisp with Active-X.
--
John Uhden, Cadlantic/formerly CADvantage
--> mailto:juhden@cadlantic.com
--> http://www.cadlantic.com
2 Village Road
Sea Girt, NJ 08750
Tel. 732-974-1711
FAX 732-528-1332
"Scribble" wrote in message
news:883CE4113CE1289D11B061C66E60531A@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> OK Guys it has been suggested this would provoke interesting discussion,
so
> which is the best to use?
> Entmake seems to be more "elegant" programming and avoids standard prompts
> etc. but is it really any better/worse than using command?
> If this has already been done to death please tell me to nick off and
point
> me to the past thread(s) 🙂
>
> cheers
> Steve
>
>
>