encrypted Lisp

[Anonymous]

Hi.
I been making a number of small and big AutoLisp applications that I used for
various things designing with AutoCAD.
I made a number of designs, that now is avaible as free-download, but it seems
that a lot of people like to try some of my "in-house" software, and as I havn't
realy followed the changes from ver14 up to AutoCAD 200x , I would be very glad,
if someone could tell me, what the best encrypting program is ; then I can add a
line checking date or existance of some file, making the application stop, so
folks can try some design rutines that _work_ .
The rutines I like to make people try are quite specialised applications, but
recently I had a look around to se what is offered concerning "unrolling"
applications, and in this "niche" I found nothing realy happened and I found my
own rutines being able to handle whatever the other programs I found couldn't
maneage. But it's not just the simple unfilding rutines I like to offer as time
limited version ; designing with unfoldeble surfaces work just perfect with my
3D-Honeycomb method, as if you make a frame structure within develoble surfaces,
you have both the Honeycomb structure _and_ the surface paneling that will fit
_exact_ onto the framework, -------- guess a lot of you know how a modern door
are made ; it is nothing but two thin cheap skins with paper honeycomb structure
glued inbetween. If you ever seen one of these doors, you proberly be surprised
that just thick paper "Honeycomb" can add that much strength to two thin surface
panels, and the 3D-Honeycomb do more than that ; it make you produce an
assembly Honeycomb structure, where you can add a surface outside and inside if
you can just unfold the original surface .
This is why I have started thinking about offering decent unfolding rutines, and
like to know what to do, if you develob applications to work ontop AutoCAD, when
you are stuck with an old version AutoCAD, and want the applications to be used
with latest versions beside develobing the 3D-Honeycomb within 3Ds ?

Here are some links that show the 3D-Honeycomb structure so you know what I
mean;
http://w1.1396.telia.com/~u139600113/upl/fuselage-text-1w.jpg

http://w1.1396.telia.com/~u139600113/upl/fuselage-text-2w.jpg

http://w1.1396.telia.com/~u139600113/upl/fuselage-wings-3d.jpg

Also these show what structures I want to show how to cover with an integrated
surface ;
http://w1.1396.telia.com/~u139600113/:))/kassehus-3-3.gif

http://w1.1396.telia.com/~u139600113/:))/fig4.jpg

http://w1.1396.telia.com/~u139600113/:))/f-117-8.jpg

These are just a few, showing the 3D-Honeycomb structure, that can be made with
tradisional 2D manufactoring like Laser cutter or pounching mashines in sheet
material.

Here are a graphic that show what Im'e now "giving away" as free download, at ;
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Cyber-Boat

http://w1.1396.telia.com/~u139600113/grafik/10-meter-Wood.jpg


------- you need to sign up as member, but you proberly will like a lot of what
you can se in "files", or "photos" folders.

Still my problem is ; how to make a encrypt that can't be broken like the old
ones we had that could be broken ?
Have a nice day.
Per Corell

[Anonymous]

Hi.
I been making a number of small and big AutoLisp applications that I used for
various things designing with AutoCAD.
I made a number of designs, that now is avaible as free-download, but it seems
that a lot of people like to try some of my "in-house" software, and as I havn't
realy followed the changes from ver14 up to AutoCAD 200x , I would be very glad,
if someone could tell me, what the best encrypting program is ; then I can add a
line checking date or existance of some file, making the application stop, so
folks can try some design rutines that _work_ .
The rutines I like to make people try are quite specialised applications, but
recently I had a look around to se what is offered concerning "unrolling"
applications, and in this "niche" I found nothing realy happened and I found my
own rutines being able to handle whatever the other programs I found couldn't
maneage. But it's not just the simple unfilding rutines I like to offer as time
limited version ; designing with unfoldeble surfaces work just perfect with my
3D-Honeycomb method, as if you make a frame structure within develoble surfaces,
you have both the Honeycomb structure _and_ the surface paneling that will fit
_exact_ onto the framework, -------- guess a lot of you know how a modern door
are made ; it is nothing but two thin cheap skins with paper honeycomb structure
glued inbetween. If you ever seen one of these doors, you proberly be surprised
that just thick paper "Honeycomb" can add that much strength to two thin surface
panels, and the 3D-Honeycomb do more than that ; it make you produce an
assembly Honeycomb structure, where you can add a surface outside and inside if
you can just unfold the original surface .
This is why I have started thinking about offering decent unfolding rutines, and
like to know what to do, if you develob applications to work ontop AutoCAD, when
you are stuck with an old version AutoCAD, and want the applications to be used
with latest versions beside develobing the 3D-Honeycomb within 3Ds ?

Here are some links that show the 3D-Honeycomb structure so you know what I
mean;
http://w1.1396.telia.com/~u139600113/upl/fuselage-text-1w.jpg

http://w1.1396.telia.com/~u139600113/upl/fuselage-text-2w.jpg

http://w1.1396.telia.com/~u139600113/upl/fuselage-wings-3d.jpg

Also these show what structures I want to show how to cover with an integrated
surface ;
http://w1.1396.telia.com/~u139600113/:))/kassehus-3-3.gif

http://w1.1396.telia.com/~u139600113/:))/fig4.jpg

http://w1.1396.telia.com/~u139600113/:))/f-117-8.jpg

These are just a few, showing the 3D-Honeycomb structure, that can be made with
tradisional 2D manufactoring like Laser cutter or pounching mashines in sheet
material.

Here are a graphic that show what Im'e now "giving away" as free download, at ;
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Cyber-Boat

http://w1.1396.telia.com/~u139600113/grafik/10-meter-Wood.jpg


------- you need to sign up as member, but you proberly will like a lot of what
you can se in "files", or "photos" folders.

Still my problem is ; how to make a encrypt that can't be broken like the old
ones we had that could be broken ?
Have a nice day.
Per Corell

[Anonymous]

You could use visual lisp and compile the routines

[Anonymous]

Hi.
You mean buy Virtual Lisp and provide Autodesk the applications ;))
P.C.

whorton skrev i meddelelsen ...
You could use visual lisp and compile the routines

[Anonymous]

Perhaps if you define some of your terms it would be easier to understand
your question :>)

develob
develobing
develoble
existance
havn't
inbetween
avaible
ontop
maneage
proberly
realy
rutines
specialised
unfilding
unfoldeble

"P.C." wrote in message
news:C0A7F59209B3CAB2D33A1C624DB63535@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> Hi.
> I been making a number of small and big AutoLisp applications that I used
for
> various things designing with AutoCAD.
> I made a number of designs, that now is avaible as free-download, but it
seems
> that a lot of people like to try some of my "in-house" software, and as I
havn't
> realy followed the changes from ver14 up to AutoCAD 200x , I would be very
glad,
> if someone could tell me, what the best encrypting program is ; then I can
add a
> line checking date or existance of some file, making the application stop,
so
> folks can try some design rutines that _work_ .
> The rutines I like to make people try are quite specialised applications,
but
> recently I had a look around to se what is offered concerning "unrolling"
> applications, and in this "niche" I found nothing realy happened and I
found my
> own rutines being able to handle whatever the other programs I found
couldn't
> maneage. But it's not just the simple unfilding rutines I like to offer
as time
> limited version ; designing with unfoldeble surfaces work just perfect
with my
> 3D-Honeycomb method, as if you make a frame structure within develoble
surfaces,
> you have both the Honeycomb structure _and_ the surface paneling that will
fit
> _exact_ onto the framework, -------- guess a lot of you know how a modern
door
> are made ; it is nothing but two thin cheap skins with paper honeycomb
structure
> glued inbetween. If you ever seen one of these doors, you proberly be
surprised
> that just thick paper "Honeycomb" can add that much strength to two thin
surface
> panels, and the 3D-Honeycomb do more than that ; it make you produce an
> assembly Honeycomb structure, where you can add a surface outside and
inside if
> you can just unfold the original surface .
> This is why I have started thinking about offering decent unfolding
rutines, and
> like to know what to do, if you develob applications to work ontop
AutoCAD, when
> you are stuck with an old version AutoCAD, and want the applications to be
used
> with latest versions beside develobing the 3D-Honeycomb within 3Ds ?
>
> Here are some links that show the 3D-Honeycomb structure so you know what
I
> mean;
> http://w1.1396.telia.com/~u139600113/upl/fuselage-text-1w.jpg
>
> http://w1.1396.telia.com/~u139600113/upl/fuselage-text-2w.jpg
>
> http://w1.1396.telia.com/~u139600113/upl/fuselage-wings-3d.jpg
>
> Also these show what structures I want to show how to cover with an
integrated
> surface ;
> http://w1.1396.telia.com/~u139600113/:))/kassehus-3-3.gif
>
> http://w1.1396.telia.com/~u139600113/:))/fig4.jpg
>
> http://w1.1396.telia.com/~u139600113/:))/f-117-8.jpg
>
> These are just a few, showing the 3D-Honeycomb structure, that can be made
with
> tradisional 2D manufactoring like Laser cutter or pounching mashines in
sheet
> material.
>
> Here are a graphic that show what Im'e now "giving away" as free download,
at ;
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Cyber-Boat
>
> http://w1.1396.telia.com/~u139600113/grafik/10-meter-Wood.jpg
>
>
> ------- you need to sign up as member, but you proberly will like a lot of
what
> you can se in "files", or "photos" folders.
>
> Still my problem is ; how to make a encrypt that can't be broken like the
old
> ones we had that could be broken ?
> Have a nice day.
> Per Corell
>
>
>
>
>
>

[Anonymous]

Jim -

A bit of tolerance? If you can look at the original posters email
address you will see that it is DK which is Denmark. I'd hate to think
what a message I tried to write in Danish would look like! His message
is quite legible, mine would be total gibberish.
--
Anne Brown
Manager, Moderator
Autodesk Product Support discussion groups
Discussion Q&A: http://www.autodesk.com/discussion

Jim Short wrote:
>
> Perhaps if you define some of your terms it would be easier to understand
> your question :>)
>
> develob
> develobing
> develoble (snip)

[Anonymous]

Hi

Jim Short skrev i meddelelsen <0D1888F04107439A94C5E49DB9B8AD72@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb>...
>Perhaps if you define some of your terms it would be easier to understand
>your question :>)
>
>develob
>develobing
>develoble

You are quite right, --- I realy shuld have a good spell checker, but I guess you understand my main problem ; to update a bunch of Lisp working fine < ver 14 .
Guess you know the "Virtual company" idear where everyone working with Acad belong to a Virtual company so an application develober have the chance offering applications develobed on AutoCAD platform , ------- unfolded surfaces allways have been a major problem not just spelling but also when you need to show that you don't need advanced matematics to "unroll" a single curved surface, from an AutoCAD mesh entity. I worked a lot with this feature and _allways_ found unrolled panels created in AutoCAD to have a perfect fit in real ; just have a look at the different designs here.
http://w1.1396.telia.com/~u139600113/ ( this is _no_ commersial ).

Anyway I now develobed this new building method , that I find "fill in a hole" between advanced rapid prototyping and advanced 3-D routering , that realy havn't changed much the last 10 years, ------- maby you have to be a specialist to se that this thing work, but then there _are_ specialist's around, as I had many positive responses concerning this "new Lego block".
I will not go into details with this, but ask if Autodesk still support develobers as then my problems updating the Lisp applications that fit a surface to these structures could be solved.
Have a nice day.
P.C.

[Anonymous]

Dear Ann,
If read on I believe that you will find that this poster has quite a grip on
our language and was in a hurry to post.
Jim
Anne Brown wrote in message
news:3B89A6AC.93902491@autodesk.com...
> Jim -
>
> A bit of tolerance? If you can look at the original posters email
> address you will see that it is DK which is Denmark. I'd hate to think
> what a message I tried to write in Danish would look like! His message
> is quite legible, mine would be total gibberish.
> --
> Anne Brown
> Manager, Moderator
> Autodesk Product Support discussion groups
> Discussion Q&A: http://www.autodesk.com/discussion
>
> Jim Short wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps if you define some of your terms it would be easier to
understand
> > your question :>)
> >
> > develob
> > develobing
> > develoble (snip)