Solved! Go to Solution.
Solved by reidmatthew. Go to Solution.
Hi @alaut Thanks for asking about moving files with dependents in Vault. As you already saw, this unfortunately is still under consideration with the Vault Product team. That is in this Vault Ideas thread: Move files and include dependents. I do agree with you that this could prove useful in many situations. For now, we will need to see what the product team determines about adding this to a future version of Vault. Try to have any many people vote for the idea as you can to help it gain support and strength.
This is an old thread, but still relevant today. Since there is no better way i use "Copy design" function for moving finished assembly to "clean" folder.
Select main assembly, right click, choose "Copy Design", then in copy window choose "Copy To" desired folder (Be sure to mark all parts and drawings). After copy you can delete the primary "dirty" folder.
This removes versions though, so consider that before proceeding.
Other idea with "search" would be to check out main assembly with all sub files and check them in at the same time, than try sorting by "checked in" time. You shall be able to select all of the parts that has been checked in in same batch? NB I haven't tested out this method myself.
Hope this helps.
Okay, well... I am sorely disappointed... again. It has been almost 11 YEARS now?!? Wow, I figured since they can find where used, uses, etc. that they may have this functionality implemented by now, since the main bulk of the search criteria is there... Like, that to me seems like a shoe-in to a small update, low hanging fruit, small win with big koodos... but nope. I may have to start digging in the ilogic stuff to see if there are other programmers out there that actually listen to the user base and their common frustrations... it is these small day to day things that can really make/break a product and it's reputation with users. I am commonly coming across many posts that have been initiated, but still exist 10 years or so and still no update.
Autodesk.... WHYY!!!!!!?????
Dude, they are all busy changing the shape of icons in ribbons for the next update :)))
It's been a long time I just gave up...
Hello all,
The Idea associated with this (link found above) is still open... I suggest adding your votes and comments directly to the idea to re-invigorate some interest in it.
Thanks!
Chris Benner
Industry Community Manager – Design & Manufacturing
If a response answers your question, please use ACCEPT SOLUTION to assist other users later.
Also be generous with Likes! Thank you and enjoy!
Its now 13 years ago this was atopic. was doing this decade. Still is.
How can engaged community participation be expected with this sort of approach ?
Solid works are getting ahead people !
I marked the structure i needed to move. Edit properties, make or use an existing property to mark the collection "to move" . Then add "to move" to filter and you have a drag and drop selection ready to get going with organising. Remember to edit and remove the "to move" after ...and go ahead to next move procedure while you wonder why these hoops are necessary 13 years after the need to move files including children surprisingly came up.
BTW: Be mindfull if using copy design to achieve this. It's not a good way to go in many cases. Any PLM connections will be faulty a best, revision and version hisotry would along with relations across common usage would suffer or have to be rearranged.
Add another year to this feature. I don't think any number of votes or discussion on the idea is helping at this point.?
Yikes. Yet another instance of thinking "Hmmm, so how do I do this straightforward thing that many people must use and that Autodesk must have hidden somewhere...." only to find that no, they've actually not bothered to add it at all.
@tquiel40 wrote:Solid works are getting ahead people !
SolidWorks has been ahead for a long time. When you use SolidWorks, it feels like one of those robotic systems where you tell the arm what path to trace and it figures it out. When you use Inventor & Vault, it feels like you've been given levers and have to figure out the manual controls of each of the robot's actuators.
@AlexZW28B wrote:Okay, well... I am sorely disappointed... again. It has been almost 11 YEARS now?!? Wow, I figured since they can find where used, uses, etc. that they may have this functionality implemented by now, since the main bulk of the search criteria is there... Like, that to me seems like a shoe-in to a small update, low hanging fruit, small win with big koodos... but nope. I may have to start digging in the ilogic stuff to see if there are other programmers out there that actually listen to the user base and their common frustrations... it is these small day to day things that can really make/break a product and it's reputation with users. I am commonly coming across many posts that have been initiated, but still exist 10 years or so and still no update.
Autodesk.... WHYY!!!!!!?????
Absolutely. Autodesk could fix 90% of Inventor's reputation with a dedicated "low hanging fruit" department that focussed on small but persistent gripes that users have while doing basic things.